In Wake of Canadian PM’s Visit,  Members of U.S. House of Representatives Northern Border Caucus Express Concern Over Trump’s Proposed Biometric Screening Requirements

 “The United States and Canada have worked cooperatively for decades to ensure efficient border management while promoting travel, trade, and border security between our two countries. Adding an additional and unneeded layer of screening for the hundreds of thousands of individuals crossing the U.S.-Canada border would create unnecessary congestion across our infrastructure and customs processes.”                                                – U.S. Congresswoman Louise Slaughter representing the Niagara, County/Western New York region.

News from the Buffalo, New York Office of U.S. Congressman Brian Higgins

Posted February 16th, 2017 on Niagara At Large

In Bipartisan Letter to Homeland Security Secretary Members Stress Need to Consider Unique Relationship Between the U.S. and Canada.

The Peace Bridge crossing the upper Niagara River between Fort Erie in Niagara, Ontario and Buffalo, New York. File photo by Doug Draper

The Peace Bridge crossing the upper Niagara River between Fort Erie in Niagara, Ontario and Buffalo, New York. File photo by Doug Draper

As the critical relationship between the United States and Canada is in the spotlight after Canadian Prime Minster Justin Trudeau’s visit to Washington, D.C., several members of the House of Representatives Northern Border Caucus are sending a letter to U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly cautioning against the existing proposal requiring implementation of biometric screening at Land Ports of Entry (LPOE). 

The bipartisan letter is signed by Northern Border Caucus co-chairs Rep. Brian Higgins (D-NY-26) and Rep. Kevin Cramer (R-ND-At-large) as well as Congressmembers Louise Slaughter (NY-25), Peter Welch (VT-At-large), Carol Shea-Porter (NH-1) and Suzan DelBene (WA-1).   The members point out, “Each day, nearly 400,000 people cross the US-Canada land border along with over $2 billion in goods and services.” 

They argue that the Beyond the Border Action Plan already established a joint biographic entry-exit initiative and any further security measures should be coordinated between both countries. 

Rep. Higgins spoke about the issue on the House Floor: View a video of his address by clicking here –

“Our border infrastructure is already congested, hampering the seamless flow of goods and people across our border and the economic growth potential that comes with it,” said Rep. Higgins, whose Western New York district includes four international crossings.  “Adding another checkpoint layer is logistically unfeasible for many bridges and plazas already at capacity and completely counterproductive to efforts that feed our local and national economies.”

U.S. Congressman Louise Slaughter, representing the Niagara County, New York area.

U.S. Congressman Louise Slaughter, representing the Niagara County, New York area.

“The United States and Canada have worked cooperatively for decades to ensure efficient border management while promoting travel, trade, and border security between our two countries. Adding an additional and unneeded layer of screening for the hundreds of thousands of individuals crossing the U.S.-Canada border would create unnecessary congestion across our infrastructure and customs processes. I’m proud to join my colleagues in sending this letter to Secretary Kelly to ensure safe and efficient cross border travel between the U.S. and Canada,” said Rep. Slaughter.

“The commerce and tourism that comes with sharing a border is a critical factor in maintaining a vibrant economy,” Rep. DelBene said. “Adding additional barriers would have an immediate and detrimental effect on the local economies of our border communities.”

Rep. Welch said, “This idea is a bad idea and a step in the wrong direction. Long wait times at the border are already delaying Vermonters and Canadians traveling for both work and pleasure. We should be working to enhance the special and mutually beneficial bilateral relationship we have with Canada, not hinder it.”

“I urge Secretary Kelly to abandon this unnecessary proposal because it would lengthen lines, increase wait times, and interfere with commercial traffic, negatively impacting New Hampshire tourism and our local economy,” said Rep. Shea-Porter.

Expedited implementation of a biometric entry-exit tracking system for all travelers to the United States is among the items listed in President Trump’s Executive Order issued on January 27, 2017.

NIAGARA AT LARGE encourages you to join the conversation by sharing your views on this post in the space below the Bernie quote.

A reminder that we only post comments by individuals who also share their first and last names.

For more news and commentary from Niagara At Large – an independent, alternative voice for our greater binational Niagara region – become a regular visitor and subscriber to NAL at www.niagaraatlarge.com .

 “A politician thinks of the next election. A leader thinks of the next generation.” – Bernie Sanders

 

 

Advertisements

One response to “In Wake of Canadian PM’s Visit,  Members of U.S. House of Representatives Northern Border Caucus Express Concern Over Trump’s Proposed Biometric Screening Requirements

  1. I wonder how many Canadians are aware of this Bill 23
    U.S. border guards would get new powers to question, search and even detain Canadian citizens on Canadian soil under a bill proposed by the Liberal government.

    Legal experts say Bill C-23, introduced by Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale, and likely to pass in the current sitting of Parliament, could also erode the standing of Canadian permanent residents by threatening their automatic right to enter Canada.

    The bill would enshrine in law a reciprocal agreement for customs and immigration pre-clearance signed by the governments of Stephen Harper and Barack Obama in 2015. Both houses of Congress passed the U.S. version of the bill in December.

    Michael Greene, an immigration lawyer in Calgary, says C-23 takes away an important right found in the existing law.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s