“Existing crude oil transport infrastructure near or in the Great Lakes makes the ecosystem particularly vulnerable to spills, particularly in 15 areas the committee identified (including the Niagara River, Long Point Bay along the shores of Lake Erie and the northern shores of Lakes Ontario) based on their level of biodiversity and as highly valued habitats for fish spawning, such as estuaries, rivers and bays.”
– from the International Joint Commission’s Great Lakes Science Advisory Board report, titled ‘Potential Ecological Impacts of Crude Oil Transport in the Great Lakes Basin
News from the Canada/U.S. International Joint Commission’s Science Advisory Board
Posted December 12th, 2018 on Niagara At Large
Oil production in central northern United States and western Canada has increased rapidly since 2010. Its transport near or through the Great Lakes region via pipelines and rail has expanded as a result.
What does this mean for the lakes in terms of the environmental threats posed by crude oil transport, and what are the potential ecological impacts from a spill in freshwater ecosystems like the Great Lakes?
The Science Priority Committee of the International Joint Commission’s Great Lakes Science Advisory Board investigated these questions as well as areas of particular vulnerability to oil spills and potential responses to spills. Its findings and recommendations for additional research and monitoring needs are included in their report, Potential Ecological Impacts of Crude Oil Transport in the Great Lakes Basin.
When available scientific literature is considered, the committee found that all levels of the aquatic food chain would be impacted by a spill, from plankton to fish to fish-eating birds and mammals.
Because the lakes provide the largest source of fresh surface water for almost 40 million people and drinking water for many of these residents, the risk of a spill affecting drinking water may be significant, particularly when currents transport crude oil to the vicinity of drinking water intakes.
Existing crude oil transport infrastructure near or in the Great Lakes makes the ecosystem particularly vulnerable to spills, particularly in 15 areas the committee identified based on their level of biodiversity and as highly valued habitats for fish spawning, such as estuaries, rivers and bays. Most areas are near oil pipelines or rail corridors, and five areas are near refineries.
The committee also concluded that adequate response to an oil spill to minimize damage is critical. The report highlights the key government agencies responsible for spill response, as well as the types of actions undertaken to contain and remove spilled oil.
Despite capabilities that exist for spill response, challenges remain for spill response in ice-covered waters, for spills of heavier crudes that sink immediately following a spill or after weathering, and for sensitive habitats where response actions may negatively impact those habitats.
Additional research is needed on a number of topics related to impacts of various crude oil types on freshwater ecosystems. The report should inform research and monitoring activities and help to improve spill response measures as well as potentially aid in decisions on oil transport infrastructure siting.
The Great Lakes Science Advisory Board is one of the key advisory groups to the IJC, which reports on progress made under the Canada-United States Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement to restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the lakes and their connecting waters. The IJC was established under the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 to help the United States and Canada prevent and resolve disputes over the use of the waters the two countries share.
From the IJC’s Great Lakes Science Advisory Board’s Report – Description of 15 areas of ecological vulnerability to oil spills in the Great Lakes basin –
Areas of Vulnerability Potential Source of Crude Oil Vulnerable Habitat or Species
- St. Louis River Estuary, Refinery, pipeline crossing Sturgeon, wild rice
- Chequamegon Bay, Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Nearshore pipeline Wild rice, waterfowl, colonial water birds, lake trout spawning
- Thunder Bay, Lake Superior National Marine Conservation Area Nearshore rail Lake trout spawning, sturgeon spawning (rivers)
- Northern Lake Michigan and Straits of Mackinac, Nearshore pipeline and pipeline crossing Lake trout spawning, coastal wetlands, alvars
- Northern Green Bay, Nearshore pipeline Walleye, coastal wetlands
- Grand Traverse Bay, Nearshore pipeline (small) Trout streams, lake trout, lake whitefish, salmon spawning
- Southern Lake Michigan, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Refinery, rail, pipeline Coastal wetlands, dunes
- Georgian Bay Biosphere, Reserve Nearshore rail Coastal wetlands, spawning
- Saginaw Bay, Nearshore pipeline Walleye, yellow perch, waterfowl.
- Huron-Erie Corridor, Refineries, pipeline crossings Sturgeon, wetlands, waterfowl
- Maumee Bay, Refineries, pipelines Coastal wetlands, walleye
- South Lake Erie, Presque Isle Nearshore rail Nearshore spawning, wetlands
- Long Point Bay, Refinery Wetlands, migratory waterfowl
- Niagara River, Pipelines, nearshore rail Sturgeon spawning
- North Lake Ontario, Nearshore rail Coastal wetlands, spawning
To read the full report, click on – Potential Ecological Impacts of Crude Oil Transport in the Great Lakes Basin.
NIAGARA AT LARGE encourages you to join the conversation by sharing your views on this post in the space following the Bernie Sanders quote below.
A reminder that we only post comments by individuals who also share their first and last names.
For more news and commentary from Niagara At Large – an independent, alternative voice for our greater bi-national Niagara region – become a regular visitor and subscriber to NAL at www.niagaraatlarge.com .
“A politician thinks of the next election. A leader thinks of the next generation.” – Bernie Sanders