Ontario Government Is Limiting Urban Sprawl Options

Hamilton city planners may not like it but this could be good news if you want to see a limit or  end to paving over ever more of what’s left of paradise

A News Analysis from Hamilton, Ontario-based ‘Citizens At City Hall,” known by many in Hamilton simply as CATCH

Posted August 24th, 2017 on Niagara At Large

(A Brief Foreword by Niagara At Large journalist and publisher Doug Draper – If, as the following recent news post from the Hamilton group Citizens At City Hall suggests, the Ontario government is taking steps to limit discourage more low-density urban sprawl into what is left of our farm lands, forests and other green places, then Kudos for the provincial government.

Hopefully, it will help stop the bulldozers and buzz saws from invading Thundering Water Forest and other green places here in Niagara.)

Hamiltion, Ontario – Planning staff (for the City of Hamilton) say updated provincial anti-sprawl rules have ignored city concerns and will restrict urbanization of more farmland such as the Elfrida expansion. They’re also worried Hamilton can’t meet the new rules requiring higher density housing and employment near LRT stops.

A report delivered last week reminds councillors that the comprehensive review carried out by Queen’s Park over more than two years also rejected the city’s plea to remove lands from the protected Greenbelt. And it warns that additional protection of farmland may be imposed by the Wynne government.

“The Growth Plan promotes compact growth in complete communities, and focuses on intensification and the prioritization of growth within existing settlement areas,” explains the staff report.

“To promote intensification, the province has increased the residential intensification target to require that 60 percent of all new residential units are to be built within the built boundary by 2031. The previous target in the 2006 Growth Plan was 40 percent.”

City staff calculate this means over 10,000 new residences must be located in the existing built-up area by 2041 and they forecast almost all of those will be apartment units. Toward the end of that period they expect over 2200 units a year will need to be built – twice the current average per year – and their report reminds councillors that the city opposed the higher target and “this concern remains valid.”

Staff fear that this predicted concentration will also jeopardize city plans because it will “result in all demand for apartments being accommodated in the built-up area”, leaving new growth areas like Elfrida “almost entirely comprised of singles/semis and townhouses.”  Such traditional “low density communities do not meet the provincial policy goals of planning for complete communities and a range of housing types” says the report and can’t achieve the required greenfield density of 80 residents per hectare.

The report notes that council opposition to this increase in greenfield density also “remains valid”. Previously the requirement was for 50 residents per hectare: “It is difficult to determine the impact that this increased density target, combined with the increased intensification target previously discussed, will have on the housing mix within the new growth areas and the ability of the City to plan for complete communities.”

Provincial legislation says that before the city tries to expand its urban boundary onto farmland it must prove “that sufficient lands to accommodate growth cannot be accommodated through intensification and existing designated greenfield lands.” This is another part of an on-going effort by the Wynne government to reduce expensive urban sprawl and make cities more transit-friendly.

A specific requirement in the updated growth plan is that population density within half a kilometre of “higher order transit” stops such as LRT stations must be at least 160 persons or jobs per hectare.

It directs that these areas “will be planned and designed to be transit-supportive, including prohibiting land uses and built form that would adversely affect achievement of the density targets, planning for a diverse mix of uses, providing alternative development standards including reduced parking, ensuring connections to local and regional transit services, and providing infrastructure to support active transportation.”

These rules have Hamilton planners concerned. Although they are hopeful that alternatives can be considered such as averaging several stops to meet the target that option requires other transit-supportive measures.

Another looming issue between Hamilton and the province is the classification of agricultural lands. The city wants to do its own assessment and is worried that a provincial review will designate more lands as Prime agricultural rather than the less protective Rural classification.

“If the Provincial mapping identifies additional lands as ‘Prime’ beyond what is already identified in the Rural Hamilton Official Plan, this will result in the City losing ‘Rural’ designated lands,” notes the report.

CATCH (Citizens at City Hall) updates use transcripts and/or public documents to highlight information about Hamilton civic affairs that is not generally available in the mass media.

You can receive all CATCH free updates by sending an email to http://hamiltoncatch.org/newsletter/?p=subscribe .

Sharing links are available on the hamiltoncatch.org .

NIAGARA AT LARGE encourages you to join the conversation by sharing your views on this post in the space below the Bernie quote.

A reminder that we only post comments by individuals who also share their first and last names.

For more news and commentary from Niagara At Large – an independent, alternative voice for our greater binational Niagara region – become a regular visitor and subscriber to NAL at www.niagaraatlarge.com .

 “A politician thinks of the next election. A leader thinks of the next generation.” – Bernie Sanders

 

Advertisements

2 responses to “Ontario Government Is Limiting Urban Sprawl Options

  1. If the Conservatives get into power after the next election, it is almost a certainty the this will be repealed and it will be speawl and more sprawl

    Like

  2. Thank you for continuing to draw attention to a massively important issue in the Niagara Region.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s