A Post from CATCH, also known as the ever relentless watchdog group, Citizens at City Hall in neighbouring Hamilton, Ontario
(Niagara At Large is posting the following piece from the Hamilton online site CATCH because there are still strains of interest, even in this 21st century as some look for more earthly favourable transportation alternatives, to run a multi-lane highway from the car and truck congested GTA, through Hamilton and Niagara, above the Niagara Escarpment, where this Robert Moses 1950s auto track would cut through some of what is left of the best crop and livestock lands in southern Ontario.
Niagara’s regional council is going to Queen’s Park this spring, around what it calls ‘Niagara Week’, to promote a movement forward on what is calls a transportation “corridor” which could mean rail or some other transporation mode, or could be a euphemism for a highway for the middle half of the 21st century for all we know – even as the soaring price of gasoline and diesel fuel might quite likely make other modes of transportation look like a free ride, for all we know.
Now here is the following piece by CATCH and let me repeat, CATCH is a great site that is all about grassroots democracy and telling what the mainstream media, including that all-mighty Hamilton Spectator newspaper is not all that ready to tell, and Niagara At Large encourages you to visit Catch regularly.)

A mid-pennisula highway would cut a swath above the Niagara Escarpment, through numerous kilometres of croplands and wetland, watershed and other natural areas to drive ever more cars and trucks back and forth from the U.S. to the GTA. Is it worth it? How much sense does another high-cost highway make by the time it might open, in the middle of the 21st century.
Hamilton councillors and the senior city staff are continuing to lobby for a mid-peninsula highway to the aerotropolis despite an exhaustive provincial study that concluded three years ago that there is no need for the controversial project. Provincial officials who explained the recommendations of the Niagara to GTA study to council last month were accused of pushing a “political” decision and their responses dismissed as “hogwash” by both Brad Clark and Terry Whitehead. Continue reading




































![dontfrack1[1]](https://niagaraatlarge.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/dontfrack11.jpg?w=300&h=211)






![Stompin-Tom-660[1]](https://niagaraatlarge.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/stompin-tom-6601.jpg?w=300&h=213)






![Media_Propaganda_by_Trosious[1]](https://niagaraatlarge.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/media_propaganda_by_trosious1.jpg?w=194&h=300)





![SOSLOG[1]](https://niagaraatlarge.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/soslog1.jpg?w=300&h=225)

![IRA_iraq_iran_c_55[1]](https://niagaraatlarge.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ira_iraq_iran_c_551.jpg?w=500)


![dc-keystone-pipeline-rally1[1]](https://niagaraatlarge.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/dc-keystone-pipeline-rally11.jpg?w=300&h=240)
