A Submission from the Office Ontario Environmental Commissioner Gord Miller
(A brief foreword by Niagara At Large publisher Doug Draper – The following release on a new report by Ontario’s independent environmental watchdog Gord Miller stresses that while energy conservation saves the province and consumers more money, not to mention being far better for the environment, in the long run, the provincial government has not done enough to encourage all of us – governments, private businesses and residents across the province, alike – to practice more environment conservation.
But when you think of it, energy conservation doesn’t make many players in the energy industry any money and might even cost them. All it does is save us money and leave a lighter footprint on the planet.
Please read the release below and click on the link to read Gord Miller’s full report.)
January 8, 2012 – Ontario’s Environmental Commissioner, Gord Miller, says uncertainty about the future of electricity conservation programs is discouraging further energy savings in Ontario.
Miller today released Volume Two of his 2011 Annual Energy Conservation Progress Report. This report annually reviews reductions in energy usage, increases in energy efficiency, and the progress and barriers to energy conservation. Volume One of the report was released in June, 2012.
- Watch videos of the Commissioner outlining key points of the report:
- Read the Commissioner’s Opening Remarks to the Legislature
- Download the report on your computer (.pdf)
The report shows that Ontario’s electricity conservation programs are cost effective and cheaper than generating power to supply demand.
The cost of each kilowatt-hour saved through 2011 conservation programs was about 3 cents.
Yet the Environmental Commissioner found the government has been slower than expected in building a culture of conservation in Ontario, a goal announced by the government in 2004. “It’s been almost a decade, and we still have not gone beyond the foundation work to actually build the rest of the structure.”
A critical pressure point was relieved recently when the government announced it was extending the conservation programs for the province’s local distribution companies (LDCs) for a year beyond their December 31, 2014 termination date.
“This was an important development, but it is not a permanent solution,” said Miller. “The extension of the programs only highlights the need for a long-term commitment to funding conservation within electricity planning. The government needs to make conservation the new normal, so that everyone can build it into their business plans. Local distribution companies (LDCs) and suppliers have expressed reluctance to invest in needed programs without this assurance. Also, consumers and businesses may hesitate to sign up for programs with uncertain futures.”
In his review, the Environmental Commissioner also evaluated the progress made towards meeting the 2014 electricity conservation targets that had previously been established for the province’s LDCs. The report covers results from 2011, which was the first year of the new conservation framework that assigned LDCs a larger role in delivering conservation programs.
The report found that while the distribution companies were on track to meet their target of reducing total electricity usage by 6,000 gigawatt-hours (GWh) between 2011 and 2014, they would fall one-third short of needed reductions in the peak electricity demand. This could lead to increased use of natural gas-fired plants to meet this peak demand.
The Progress Report also discovered significant differences in the conservation accomplishments of LDCs. One of the findings was that LDC size was not a strong predictor of achievement.
(Niagara At Large invites you to share your views on the subject of this post below. Remember that NAL only posts views by individuals who are also willing to share their first and last name.)