Canadian Cabinet Shuffle Is A Non-Story – How Energy Efficient Light Bulbs Could Make What Is Left Of Our Democracy One Helluva Lot Cheaper

 A Commentary by Doug Draper 

It must be a pretty slow time for news in Canada when national newspapers and broadcasters are making Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s cabinet shuffle one of their lead stories.

Canadian parliamentary democracy at work

I’m serious when I say that this cabinet shuffle is a non-story. I mean does it really matter who sits on Harper’s cabinet? Every reporter and columnist – liberal or conservative – who has spent any length of time covering the way Harper does governance knows that he calls all of the shots anyway. You could have Curly, Larry and Moe, along with Homer Simpson and Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs in this prime minister’s cabinet, and it wouldn’t make any difference.

They are all, each and every one of them, no more than knobs on a seat. Trained seals. Whether they are a member of Harper’s cabinet, and every member of his caucus right down to the lowliest member of his caucus can’t even make a few statements about a historical plaque being unveiled in a park in their constituency without those statements first being filtered through the prime minister’s office.

So who cares who sits on Harper’s cabinet? And who cares who makes up his caucus of MPs, for that matter. In fact, we could save hundreds of millions of dollars a year in scarce money that could be used for health care or education for young people if we simply replaced all of these MPPs – each raking in $157,737 a year, not counting expenses – with a box of light bulbs that can be rigged up on the desk tops in front of their parliamentary seats. 

Let me explain how efficiently that could work and may I say how ‘cost effectively’ it would work for all of the advocates for austerity and less government out there.. There would be a green light bulb for ‘aye’, a red light for ‘nay’, and a white bulb for abstain. And just to show that a Canada that is still willing to export deadly substances like asbestos around the world has not completely given up on conserving what is left of the natural environment, we could use energy efficient light bulbs. Surely Harper’s oil industry bosses in Alberta would not deprive him of making that one small concession to whatever is left of an environmental movement in the country.

The buttons for these MPP-replacement light bulbs would be controlled by one of the last few people standing in the parliament – the prime minister. If the leaders of the other parties like this idea, maybe we could rig up buttons controlling lights for them too and save even more money. Doesn’t that sound just about as exciting as getting rid of the partisan hacks sitting in the country’s un-elected Senate completely? Tell me the last time this chamber of ‘sober second thought’ ever had a thought of its own, outside of any direction it receives from its political and corporate masters?

An energy efficient light bulb would cost us pennies a day compared to the $158,000 plus per year it costs for each federal member of parliament.. And who knows, things may even be brighter in the parliamentary chambers

If you think I am being silly or sarcastic in advancing a case that light bulbs could replace our parliamentary representatives, just look back to this June when every single member of every single caucus fell into line on votes for or against Harper’s controversial omnibus budget bill. If you were a knob on the Harper Conservative side of the benches, it didn’t matter how many individuals and groups across the country complained about what the bill might do to seniors benefits, health care, environmental protection and other services, everyone from Harper’s caucus from his cabinet ministers on down, mindlessly voted in favour of it. If this was a bill advanced by the opposition Liberals or NDP, have no illusions. They would vote for this bill or some facsimile of it too.

So now some may be asking how light bulbs replacing the trained seals in the parliament might ever make up for the loss of a meeting with these same knob s on a seat back home in their constituency offices. That is simple. All we need to do is to provide the constituents in each riding across the country with a toll free number where they can call and get a recorded message from the prime minister or one of whatever other party leader may have won a seat in the riding; that begins something like this; ‘Thank you for calling the constituency seat for the (whatever) party. … Your call is important to us and we ask you to follow the following instructions – press one if your interest or concern has to do with health care, press two if it has to do with seniors’ benefits, press three if it has to do with employment benefits, press four … ‘ Well you get the idea. Environmental protection would probably be much further down the list, of course, since that isn’t much of a priority in Canada any more 

Once the number is pressed, the prime minister or leader of one of the other parties will be heard responding back in a recorded message with the top ten talking points produced by their spin doctors on whatever topic you choose. It won’t make any difference since the MPP would be ordered to recite these same talking points anyway, and we have saved all kinds of tax dollars having them around to do it. See how a few energy efficient light bulbs on a seat can make what is left of our democracy in Canada so much cheaper?

Now some of you people out there that may be in to knit picking great ideas like this might ask; ‘Well what if the constituent has a rotary phone? How are they going to get the pre-recorded talking points they have a right to hear as good, upstanding taxpaying citizen of Canada?’ Well in that case, I am afraid to say to our neo-con and libertarian friends that hate government so much they would like to gas it all, that we might have to have an option where rotary phone people can dial zero and get an operator who can direct their call to those talking points.

I think it was Winston Churchill who once said something like; ‘Democracy isn’t perfect, but it is the best system we have.’ Well maybe one of the imperfections is that we still need to pay a few operators for our fellow rotary phone citizens.

Now then let’s get back to that Harper cabinet shuffle. It was pretty well know that Bed Oda was going to be removed from cabinet after her hands were caught in the cookie jar. It isn’t all that surprising, given the ethics of this government that Julian Fantino, Ontario’s former top cop for the OPP, with all of his baggage, would take her place as the new minister for the Canadian International Development Agency or CIDA or whatever the hell that is.

At any rate, here it is July 5 and I am already willing to predict that this cabinet shuffle, along with the recent news about the separation of Tom Cruise and his third and latest contract wife for the past five years, Katie Holmes, will top of the list of non-stories for the month of July.

I will leave it to you to watch what other big headlines don’t turn out to mean much this month, and correct me if I am wrong.

(Niagara At Large invites you to share your views on this post, remembering that we only post comments by individuals who are also willing to share their real first and last names.)

7 responses to “Canadian Cabinet Shuffle Is A Non-Story – How Energy Efficient Light Bulbs Could Make What Is Left Of Our Democracy One Helluva Lot Cheaper

  1. Will MacKenzie's avatar Will MacKenzie

    Sorry Doug … you are off-base about the screwy light bulbs! They are not only dangerous, they don’t save a bloody thing! They are worse pollutants than the amount of emissions that is produced by a coal-fired power plant to power them!

    Dalton McGuinty’s decision to make them mandatory, without any discussion or study, is just icing on the cake of why I will not use them.

    My partner and I have been stockpiling REAL light bulbs, in preparation for the stupid ban that will take effect next year.

    You may not like what Harper is doing or how he does it – I won’t say that I totally disagree on that point.

    But to suggest there are financial and ecological savings by using the compact fluorescent lights (CFLs) is downright wrong!

    They may use less electricity … but the net effect on the environment and economy is worse, much worse than they are worth!

    Hi Will – Your thoughts on the flourescent, “high efficiency” light bulbs are worth a good discussion and remind me of an interview on I heard on CBC radio a couple of months ago with someone who made a compelling case for the traditional incandescent light bulb. I could be presuaded to amend my proposed model for parliamentary to replace the so-called “green” flourescent bulbs with incandescent ones. Almost anything is better than what we have sitting in the seats of parliament now – NAL publisher Doug Draper

    Like

  2. Gail Benjafield's avatar Gail Benjafield

    spot on,once again, Doug.

    Like

  3. You could use LED bulbs. Just look at CRS Electronics in Welland for a local manufacturer.

    Like

  4. For a bunch of light bulbs they are very dim,they are not allowed to shine brighter than their leader,.possibly they are bumps on a log no training required.

    Like

  5. Dave Chappelle's avatar Dave Chappelle

    +! on LED bulbs. CF bulbs contain mercury, a deadly poison.

    As for Harper being a leader, what’s the difference?

    John Crouton was a dictator by comparison — turning 7 million law abiding Kanuks into instant criminals… wasting billions on stupid laws passed only for the appearance of doing something… and acting like a petty tyrant if not petulant child when a publisher he disagreed with was awarded a British title.

    Crouton proved his evil spitefulness when he put the Shawinigan throatshake on a much smaller man who disagreed with him, then went all lawyerly and Sergeant Schulz when asked what happened.

    In his best display of pettiness, and the one Kanuks are most thankful for, Crouton ensured the death of the Lieberal party by making corporate donations illegal. The Lieberals have never recovered.

    Like

  6. Light bulbs should be phased out because they waste so much electricity compared to LEDs and CFLs. ..

    Take a look at all of the most current article at our very own webpage
    http://www.prettygoddess.com

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.