Niagara At Large has posted a number of news and commentary pieces on the matter of climate change.
One of the most recent posts by NAL publisher Doug Draper, available for viewing on http://www.niagaraatlarge.com, slams Canada’s un-elected, Conservative-dominated Senate for killing a bill for a plan for reducing greenhouse gases that had previously received the support of a majority of duly elected members of the country’s parliament.
Niagara At Large has made it clear from its inception 11 months ago that this is a site that welcomes views that may run counter to those of its publisher and contributors. We don’t want to be an echo chamber that preaches to choir. We want to be venue for diverse views and for stimulating discussion and debate.
In that spirit, we are posting below a piece by Tom Harris, executive director of the Ottawa-based International Climate Science Coalition that questions that applauds the Senate for voting down that same climate bill. It is a column that was recently published in the Montreal Gazette and one Harris agreed to share with NAL.
As always, we encourage you to share your views in the comment boxes below this piece. Remember always to keep those views civil and attached to your own name in keeping with NAL’s comment policy, which you can visit with a click at the top of our front page. Thank you, Doug Draper
Canada’s Senate Right To Kill Cimate Bill – “Sober, second thought” trumps political correctness on climate change
By Tom Harris
On the surface, NDP Leader Jack Layton’s outrage appears justified. It is certainly unusual that an un-elected Senate would kill a bill passed by the majority of the elected Members of Parliament.

Tom Harris, executive director of International Climate Science Coalition
It is even more extraordinary that this was done after only five days of relatively brief debate by Senators. Yet the Senate did the right thing. Bill C-311, “An Act to ensure Canada assumes its responsibilities in preventing dangerous climate change”, set, as Prime Minister Stephen Harper said, “irresponsible targets” that would have led to “throwing hundreds of thousands and possibly millions of people out of work.”
But Harper missed the opportunity to tell Canadians that the bill was a disaster also because it would accomplish essentially nothing with respect to global climate even if we did meet its draconian targets. It would not have even set a good example to the world’s leading emitters of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases supposedly responsible for “dangerous climate change.”
Indeed, even it were possible to ensure “stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere”, as stated in the Purpose of C-311, climate would still change. As Professor Tim Patterson of Carleton University’s Department of Earth Sciences testified before the House of Commons Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development in 2005, “…it’s obvious that climate is and always has been variable. In fact, the only constant about climate is change; …. We certainly have no chance of stopping this natural phenomenon.” Continue reading →
Share this: Niagara At Large at wwwlniagaraatlarge.com