Push to Defund Police is Growing in Nearby Hamilton

An unprecedented wave of public involvement to defund the police has seen letters from over 400 people. Over 40 video delegations coming this Tuesday, September 8th

News from Citizens at City Hall (CATCH), a citizens watchdog group in Hamilton Ontario

Posted September 8th, 2020 on Niagara At Large

Hamilton, Ontario – In an unprecedented wave of public involvement in a civic issue, Hamilton officials have received written correspondence from over 400 people supporting the defund police campaign. The outpouring continues this week with more than three dozen people set to make personal video delegations to city councillors at the Tuesday morning on-line general issues committee meeting.

The comments and demands are various but most call for  shifting police budget dollars “towards initiatives fighting against food insecurity, racism and towards more affordable housing.” Many demand that police stop ticketing and surveillance of houseless and disabled people, and end the purchase of more weapons and high tech surveillance equipment.

The number of individuals submitting these highly critical letters is even more extraordinary given the reasonable fear that publicly challenging the police and their practices could result in personal repercussions.

Thirty-two delegations were already approved in early August and at least ten more want to join them according to the posted agenda  for Tuesday’s meeting. It also contains five written submissions.

Those are on top of nearly 300 letters sent to the city earlier this summer. Those were subsequently forwarded to the police services board for its July meeting, and joined 88 more that had been submitted directly to the police board.

A poster for one of many rallies in Canada and the United States in recent months – this one for a rally in Guelph, Ontario

At that meeting, board co-chair Don MacVicar acknowledged  the correspondence, said that he had “reviewed each one of them”, and provided a 60-second “summary” that included how many came from each city ward (although this breakdown only totalled about a tenth of the letters). MacVicar thanked the correspondents and spent another 60 seconds listing various reports on the board’s current and future agendas which he saw as responding to the correspondence.

“So the board and staff have a lot of work to do over the next while, but we are listening and we are responding,” he concluded  , “and you can see there’s a lot of information coming through in the next few meetings.”

Nearly all the correspondents want cuts to the police budget and those demands will almost certainly be underlined in this week’s video delegations. According to MacVicar, “some” also oppose defunding, although that only applies to two of the 88 sent directly to the board and no more than a handful of the 297 forwarded from the city.

One of the latter came from Ryan Burne who labelled ) police defunding “radical left thinking and dangerous” and promised to do “everything in my power and influence to get all Police Service Board members and politicians who entertain this idea voted and removed from there [sic] positions.”

On the other side Vilma Rossi argues that “year after year police budgets have expanded – vacuuming up resources from increasingly precarious social and health services.” She also contends that efforts to reform the police have repeatedly failed.

“We have seen decades of special inquiries, taskforces, commissions and reports. And still violence against members of the community continue at the hands of police officers while many politicians voice 100% support for police rather than doing their due diligence to hold police services and individual police officers accountable when violence is enacted against community members.

“Policing has not resulted in safer communities; in fact, the opposite is true. Poverty has been criminalized. Structural and systemic inequities have been ignored while police are given more and more power, weapons and resources which, all too frequently, are used against people who are Indigenous, Black, racialized, poor, unhoused, living with abusive partners, or simply engaged in peaceful dissent.”

Tuesday’s (September 8th) meeting starts at 9:30 am and can be viewed live at https://hamiltoncatch.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=8ffda5515733a1dd97a7b21fa&id=58d6f70bbd&e=a31ab29d46.

Find this article on the CATCH website here (https://hamiltoncatch.Citius20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=8ffda5515733a1dd97a7b21fa&id=c139944634&e=a31ab29d46) , along with the full archive of CATCH articles.

NIAGARA AT LARGE Encourages You To Join The Conversation By Sharing Your Views On This Post In The Space Following The Bernie Sanders Quote Below.

“A Politician Thinks Of The Next Election. A Leader Thinks Of The Next Generation.” – Bernie Sanders

One response to “Push to Defund Police is Growing in Nearby Hamilton

  1. My opinion will no doubt be unpopular to some but I think defunding to the degree that some want it is a foolish, knee jerk reaction. Trimming the budget is fine but police are essential. Divert some funding to social services to prevent problems before police intervention is needed. All police must have body cams and be held accountable. Too often they cover each others’ butts via internal investigations.

    So many complain about police until they need them. Are some bad? Yes, true in every profession from teachers to priests. Most are not. Is there racism? Yes, but there is also reverse racism and bias against police. When 100 people are at a party and someone gets shot, nobody sees a thing! Then they complain that the police aren’t doing anything. Then HELP them.

    In the US police shot a 12 year old black boy in Cleveland, Ohio for playing in a park with a toy gun, something I’m sure white kids do every day. No questions asked. Pull up the squad car and shoot! “Bang, bang, bang, stop or I’ll shoot.” Knee on the neck. Shooting in the back. Stalking with a truck and killing a man because he was jogging in broad daylight. Compare that to the van murderer in Toronto. Not a shot fired. In the US the guy would have been shot on the spot. The incident was defused by a GOOD cop.

    Remember that police deal with people in crisis, at their worst or committing crimes with callous disregard for the safety of others and are often repeat offenders known to police. They do so a dozen times a day. That is very difficult and stressful. Why weren’t they here more quickly? Why didn’t they do something different? Easy to ask but more difficult to answer. Someone will always find fault. Sure, there are problems and they need to be addressed. If your loved one is a victim it is infuriating and tragic. It is everyone’s right to protest but have a rational response to correct the problem.

    Others complain about the weaponry and militarization of the police but do these same people consider the weapons that some in the public have and their lack of concern for the welfare of others? The police can’t go up against an assault weapon with a pea shooter.

    The police do have problems to be corrected but just hope they are there when you do need them. Jumping on a bandwagon just because it is popular at the moment and getting all indignant will not solve the problem. Do these people carrying signs want to do the job of the police? I doubt it. Cooler heads, discussion and rational thought must prevail to correct the problems.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.