Surprise, Surprise – The Orange-Hair Creature & Media Ratings King Is Time Magazine’s ‘Person of the Year’

– That Ought To Sell A Few Magazines!

“It’s hard to measure the scale of his disruption. … Trump’s victory represents a long-overdue rebuke to an entrenched and arrogant governing class; for those who see it as for the worse, the destruction extends to cherished norms of civility and discourse, a politics poisoned by vile streams of racism, sexism, nativism.”

Posted December 7th, 2016 on Niagara At Large
trump-man-of-year(A Brief Foreword from Doug Draper, publisher, Niagara At Large – Last year, when Time Magazine announced its choice of German Chancellor Angela Merkel as its ‘Person of the Year’, Donald Trump reacted as follows in one of his infamous tweets – “I told you @TIME Magazine would never pick me as person of the year despite being the big favorite,” he wrote on the social media site to his over 5 million followers. “They picked person who is ruining Germany.”
“How sad,” the Donald added elsewhere of Time’s 2015 choice.
So this year, instead of choosing someone heroic like a Gord Downie of Tragically Hip, who is facing down a deadly cancer diagnosis with a world-class, record-breaking on Youtube concert tour while continuing his advocacy work for Indigenous peoples and the environement at the same time, or choosing the Indigenous people standing up against the giant petro-chemical corporations at Standing Rock, North Dakota, this “malignant narcissist,” as American doc filmmaker Michael Moore recently called him, who is now in a position to not only ruin his own country, but the entire world, wins the big prize.
How sad!
Now here is Time’s announcement, outling the the magazine’s reasons for choosing him. Then have your say on this in the space below.)

Annoucement from Time Magazine editor Nancy Gibbs

“This is the 90th time we have named the person who had the greatest influence, for better or worse, on the events of the year. So which is it this year: Better or worse? The challenge for Donald Trump is how profoundly the country disagrees about the answer.

It’s hard to measure the scale of his disruption. This real estate baron and casino owner turned reality-TV star and provocateur—never a day spent in public office, never a debt owed to any interest besides his own—now surveys the smoking ruin of a vast political edifice that once housed parties, pundits, donors, pollsters, all those who did not see him coming or take him seriously. Out of this reckoning, Trump is poised to preside, for better or worse.trump-with-gun

For those who believe this is all for the better, Trump’s victory represents a long-overdue rebuke to an entrenched and arrogant governing class; for those who see it as for the worse, the destruction extends to cherished norms of civility and discourse, a politics poisoned by vile streams of racism, sexism, nativism. To his believers, he delivers change—broad, deep, historic change, not modest measures doled out in Dixie cups; to his detractors, he inspires fear both for what he may do and what may be done in his name.

The revolution he stirred feels fully American, with its echoes of populists past, of Andrew Jackson and Huey Long and, at its most sinister, Joe McCarthy and Charles Coughlin. Trump’s assault on truth and logic, far from hurting him, made him stronger. His appeal—part hope, part snarl—dissolved party lines and dispatched the two reigning dynasties of U.S. politics. Yet his victory mirrors the ascent of nationalists across the world, from Britain to the Philippines, and taps forces far more powerful than one man’s message.

We can scarcely grasp what our generation has wrought by putting a supercomputer into all of our hands, all of the time. If you are reading this, whether on a page or a screen, there is a very good chance that you are caught up in a revolution that may have started with enticing gadgets but has now reshaped everything about how we live, love, work, play, shop, share—how our very hearts and minds encounter the world around us.

Why would we have imagined that our national conversation would simply go on as before, same people, same promises, same patterns? Perhaps the President-elect will stop tweeting—but only because he will have found some other means to tell the story he wants to tell directly to the audience that wants to hear it.

It turned out to be a failing strategy when Hillary Clinton, who loves policy solutions and believes in them, tried to make this race a character test, a referendum on Trump. But it was certainly understandable. He presented so many challenges, so many choices about what America values. Her popular-vote victory, while legally irrelevant, affirmed the prospect of a female Commander in Chief.

In fact, she crushed Trump among voters who cared most about experience and judgment and temperament, qualities that have typically mattered when choosing the leader of the free world. Even at his moment of victory, 6 in 10 voters had an unfavorable view of Trump and didn’t think he was qualified to be President.”

NIAGARA AT LARGE encourages you to join the conversation by sharing your views on this post in the space provided after the Bernie Sanders quote below.

A reminder that we only post comments by individuals who also share their first and last names.

For more news and commentary from Niagara At Large – an independent, alternative voice for our greater binational Niagara region – become a regular visitor and subscriber to NAL at .

“A politician thinks of the next election. A leader thinks of the next generation.” – Bernie Sanders


One response to “Surprise, Surprise – The Orange-Hair Creature & Media Ratings King Is Time Magazine’s ‘Person of the Year’

  1. Hard to argue that the person who may actually bring about the end of the world, or at least the destruction of large portions of it, and with his Republican minions and assorted kooks, rip away hard-won human rights from women, gays, lesbians, the black community, muslims, etc., etc.,, etc. isn’t the biggest news maker. I think it’s funny that he obviously views it as an honour. This is what Time says about their selection: “The title goes to “the person or persons who most affected the news and our lives, for good or ill, and embodied what was important about the year, for better or for worse,” as former Managing Editor Walter Isaacson wrote in the 1998 issue. That means the person is not necessarily a hero—Adolf Hitler, for example, was Person of the Year in 1938, with a cover showing him playing a ghastly organ and a cover line touting, “From the unholy organist, a hymn of hate.” Stalin got the nod twice, while the selection of Iran’s Ayatullah Khomeini in 1979, when the magazine called him “the mystic who lit the fires of hatred.”
    He’s in familiar company.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s