City Of Hamilton Pushing For Urban Development In Provincially Protected Greenbelt


News from the Hamilton, Ontario-based Citizens At City Hall (CATCH)

Posted September 12th, 2016 on Niagara At Large

Hamilton, Ontario – The City of Hamilton is still pushing for lands to be removed from the Greenbelt and it is also opposing higher densities in new developments and greater intensification targets proposed by the province.

It has submitted more than three dozen objections to the growth plan and Ontario foodland protection policies to a provincial review that concludes next month after nearly two years of public consultations.

The Greenbelt protecton zone (identified in green on this map) in Ontario has received international applause as a major step for saving farmland, but many developers hate it and so do groups representing farmers in the Niagara, Ontario region. Some have called it a "nightmare" and want it scrapped.

The Greenbelt protecton zone (identified in green on this map) in Ontario has received international applause as a major step for saving farmland, but many developers hate it and so do groups representing farmers in the Niagara, Ontario region. Some have called it a “nightmare” and want it scrapped.

Foodland protection advocates celebrated in May when the province released its draft changes to the Greenbelt boundaries without removing 104 hectares in lower Stoney Creek and 28 hectares in Waterdown that had been pushed by a majority of councillors. But there’s one more kick at the can before the revised Greenbelt Plan and Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe are finalized so the city is trying again – and groups like Environment Hamilton are continuing to offer assistance to residents to keep pushing in the opposite direction.

The long list of recommendations sent to the province in mid-August by planning staff were only made public last week as the report heads to council for rubber-stamping.

In addition to pushing again for Greenbelt cuts, the city submission objects to anti-sprawl measures unveiled in the May provincial report to require more growth to be accommodated in the built up area, and substantially higher densities to be achieved for greenfield development. The new provincial rules would require cities ensure at least 60 percent of their new growth occurs inside the built-up area, while any development outside this area would need to accommodate a minimum of 80 persons per hectare in order to make it dense enough to support transit service.

“The City of Hamilton is not in a position to support the increase in the intensification target from 40% to 60%, the increase in the persons and jobs per hectare for greenfield areas from 50 pjh to 80 pjh, and the static built boundary,” declares the submission, “until such time as the province evaluates the impact on housing mix and demand in Hamilton”.

Recognizing that the province may be unlikely to agree with Hamilton’s demands to change the 60 percent target, the submission asks that the built boundary be redefined “to include developed ‘greenfield areas’, since they are more appropriate to be included”.

Similarly, if the minimum greenfield densities are increased, the city recommends “that this target shall not apply to greenfield areas which have already been developed or undeveloped land in a council-approved secondary plan.” It also wants the province “to add cemeteries, landfills, infrastructure (stormwater management ponds, roads) and public parks to the features to be excluded from the greenfield density calculation.”

The city also wants to be given the right to decide what constitutes “major transit station areas” where higher density development will be required and to let the city determine the frequency of the transit service. Both issues could affect the way Hamilton deals with Light Rail Transit.

Other city demands seek the exclusion of rural communities from the provincial requirement for developing complete communities. The submission also reiterates a council request to include Coldwater Creek (aka Ancaster Creek) to be added to the Greenbelt river valley designation, but again does not support inclusion of Red Hill and other larger Hamilton stream valleys.

The deadline for the public to provide their comments to province has been extended to October 31. Environment Hamilton is offering a workshop on Wednesday, September 14 at the citizen group’s offices to help residents prepare and submit their input to the province.

The group is also co-hosting a public meeting on Wednesday, October 5 where the Neptis Foundation will make a presentation on how the Greenbelt Plan and the Growth Plan “interact to manage growth in the Greater Golden Horseshoe.”

In late August, Environment Hamilton organized a Greenbelt awareness cycling trip to a farm in Brant County just outside the provincially protected area. The group wants the countryside protection extended to preserve more farmland and block leapfrog development pressures in Brant.

CATCH (Citizens at City Hall) updates use transcripts and/or public documents to highlight information about Hamilton civic affairs that is not generally available in the mass media. Detailed reports of City Hall meetings can be reviewed at You can receive all CATCH free updates by sending an email to Sharing links are available on the

Visit Niagara At Large at for more news and commentary for and from the greater bi-national Niagara region.

NOW IT IS YOUR TURN. Niagara At Large encourages you to share your views on this post in the space below the Bernie quote . A reminder that we only post comments by individuals who share their first and last name with them.

 “A politician thinks of the next election. A leader thinks of the next generation.” – Bernie Sanders


One response to “City Of Hamilton Pushing For Urban Development In Provincially Protected Greenbelt

  1. My name is John Ravenda and I am a farmer with land in the Greenbelt that was expropriated 12 years ago, by the former (Ontario)Liberal government (of Dalton McGuinty).

    Why is there not a mechanism to discuss individual properties instead of the ham fist approach of the province? Much like the O.M.B. that allows these types of disputes to have a fair hearing among our piers? NO one should be allowed to tell a landowner that his property can only be what the Province wishes it to be without question? We are not in a communist country and dictated to as this is a free land that we fought for and this all seem to be taken away with this legislation.

    Let the municipalities decide how and what land is to be preserved through the current zoning laws that the people voted for and approved.

    Why are all the tree huggers that want ALL land to be in the Greenbelt but they don’t own any land as the surveys have shown of these web sites.
    To have input into the Greenbelt you should own land in the Greenbelt.

    Lives have been forever negatively impacted by the inability to develop and sell lands as others have made these decisions. For generations farmers have sold or severed their farms for their families and have become dependant on being able to do so for many generations, to have a better life or retire and severe to a child land that is no longer their own to decide upon. This is not the country and freedom we fought for and is against the
    very fabric of a Capitalist System.

    Please reconsider the ramifications of these actions and allow the landowners more say into what can be done together with preserving land in our province.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s