There Is Plenty Of Room To Hike Federal Taxes On Canada’s One Per Cent

 News from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives

Ottawa, Ontario, October 29th, 2015 – The new federal government has plenty of room to raise the taxes of Canada’s one percenters, according to a new study by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA).tax the rich

The study, released in the wake of a federal election that handed the Liberals a majority government, concludes there is plenty of room for the new government to make good on its election promise to raise the top marginal income tax rate on those earning $200,000 or more to 33%. In fact, the findings suggest there is room to do more higher up the income scale.

How Much Income Could Canada’s Top 1% Pay?, by internationally respected CCPA Research Associate Lars Osberg, shows Canada’s richest now pay a lower tax rate than in the 1990s even though their share of total income has increased dramatically.

“The top marginal income tax rate has been well over 50% for most of the time Canada has had an income tax. In fact, during Canada’s high growth years between 1940 and 1980, the top marginal income tax rate was well over 70%.  Now the top federal income tax rate is 29%,” says Osberg. “Our federal government used to ask more of Canada’s richest one per cent. There are plenty of reasons to do so again.”

Among the report’s findings:

  • Canada, on average, has become a low-tax jurisdiction for the affluent compared to the U.S. When provincial income tax is added to federal income tax, the average total top marginal income tax rate on labour income was 45.7% in 2013. The average top marginal income tax rate across American states was 47.9%.
  • Special tax treatment for capital gains and dividends and other features of the tax code meant that the top one per cent of Canada’s tax filers actually paid much less than the nominal top 45% marginal tax rate. Averaging over five years, 2008-12, the top one percent (those earning $205,460 or more) paid an average actual tax rate of 33.2%.
  • Introducing a new 65% marginal tax rate for income in excess of $205,000 would roughly double the current actual marginal tax rate at the top and could yield between $15.8 billion and $19.3 billion in additional tax revenue. The median top one percenter with taxable income of $289,000 would see a $27,000 increase, on average, in taxes.
  • If capital gains income was also taxed, the yield in additional revenue could be between $21.8 billion and $26.1 billion.
  • To put these revenue gains in context, in 2012-2013 the total tuition revenue of Canada’s colleges and universities was $8.1 billion and federal infrastructure spending was $5 billion. Total provincial and federal income tax revenue was $176.7 billion.
  • The study finds scant evidence that higher top tax rates would prompt a rush of “job creators” or “the best and brightest” to emigrate.

To view the report ‘How Much Income Tax Could Canada’s Top 1% Pay?’ or to learn more about the Canadian Centre of Policy Alternatives and its work visit the CCPA website at : http://policyalternatives.ca.

Visit Niagara At Large at www.niagaraatlarge.com for more news and commentary for and from the greater bi-national Niagara region.

(NOW IT IS YOUR TURN. Niagara At Large encourages you to share your views on this post. A reminder that we only post comments by individuals who share their first and last name with them.)

One response to “There Is Plenty Of Room To Hike Federal Taxes On Canada’s One Per Cent

  1. How about going after the off shore tax havens? There was recently a documentary on TV about a family with an $8 million dollar home who paid no taxes on it and actually got a government property improvement grant. They claimed an income of $19,000!!! How on earth did they even pay their heating bills for such a place? Their assets were hidden on the Isle of Mann…traced to a site in an empty building and later to a building where nobody would comment. There are also loads of assets hidden in Grand Cayman, Switzerland and dozens of places yet poor Joe Schmo gets taxed to the hilt. Imagine the assets for infrastructure and social benefits if these creeps paid their share.

    Like

Leave a reply to Linda McKellar Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.