U.S. Further Delays Final Decision On Canada’s Controversial Keystone Pipe

A Brief Bit of Breaking News and a Commentary from NAL publisher Doug Draper

Here is some good news on this Good Friday and just a few days before this coming Earth Day, Tuesday, April 22nd, 2014.

One of many protests near White House in past year over Tar Sands pipeline

One of many protests near White House in past year over Tar Sands pipeline

The U.S. State Department announced this April 18th that it is now delaying a final decision on construction of the Keystone and KL pipeline from Calgary’s tar sands through the U.S. Midwest to Gulf area where it would be refined until the end of this year.

U.S. environmental groups and citizens who are opposing the pipeline are greeting this as good news because it pushes a final decision by President Barack Obama and his Democratic administration past mid-term to take place across America this coming fall – elections in which any rejection of the Keystone pipe beforehand might be used by Republican candidates funded by the petro-chemical industry to go after their Democratic rivals.

Environmentalists are also saying they hope the delay means the Obama administration wants more time to study the potential risks of the pipeline and the contribution Canada’s tar sands operations are making to greenhouse emissions and climate change.

In a report posted onoline this April 18th by The Globe and Mail, Hannah McKinnon of the Torntoo-based citizen group Environmental Defence, said “the tar sands are high cost, high risk and high carbon and this is another clear signal that their future is anything but certain”

“The tar sands,” she added, “have a devastating impact on land, air, water, communities and our shared climate and it is critical that the president get it right and reject this pipeline.”

Meanwhile, Canada’s Stephen Harper government released a statement calling the State Department delay disappointing and a case of American politics getting in the way of a project it insists would be beneficial to both countries in terms of jobs and the economy.

Just a couple of final thoughts here from this commentator.

I don’t think any reasonable person, however green their shades may be, sees the tar sands operations shutting down anytime too soon.

But if, as the Harper government and its allies in the petro industry keep telling the United States, there are thousands of jobs that could be created refining this stuff, why don’t we build refining capacity right here in Canada and keep the jobs, for however many years they last, in our own country?

Finally, we should all know that as this 21st century unfolds the conversion to greener, more renewable forms of energy is coming and a number of development countries, including China, believe it or not, are reportedly working on better technologies for generating now. 

As Obama once said, those countries that take the lead in perfecting those technologies will emerge as they great economic powers of this century. So why isn’t Canada’s federal government just as interested in exploring energy alternatives as it is in exploiting the tar sands?

Maybe those are a few things to think about this coming Earth Day.

To read the story The Globe and Mail posted on Keystone this April 18th, click on http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/energy-and-resources/us-once-again-delays-decision-on-keystone-xl-pipeline/article18066497/ .then share your views below with us.

(NOW IT IS YOUR TURN. Niagara At Large encourages you to share your views on this post. A reminder that we only post comments by individuals who share their first and last name with them.)

3 responses to “U.S. Further Delays Final Decision On Canada’s Controversial Keystone Pipe

  1. Preston Haskell's avatar Preston Haskell

    I guess we should be satisfied that instead of a clean flowing pipeline we are to be saddled with high risk trains and their tons of diesel exhaust spewing into the fresh air for a gazillion miles across the continent.
    We have recently been witness to the safety of trains and the fiery destruction of towns and townspeople.

    Like

  2. The Kalamazoo River, in Michigan, three years after the “Enbridge” pipeline ruptured and raw Alberta sludge continued to be pumped for seventeen hours until stopped is still being “CLEANED” up (if it ever is completely???)
    “Ontario is NEXT?????” Our PM and “HIS” Alberta appointed NEB gave the green light???????
    The XL Pipeline delay is heralded as great news by most sane people and the corporate Oil conglomerate must be chomping at the bit over the delay and possible total denial of their obscene plan. (based on profit without thought or consequence)

    Like

  3. Preston Haskell's avatar Preston Haskell

    Mr. Somers,
    What thought have most ‘sane people’ given to death and destruction from trains?
    More than pollution of a nearby river, the derailment in Lac Megantic, Que., involving a train of crude oil from the United States killed at least 42 people and destroyed a large section of the town 250 km from Montreal.
    Try: http://newsalertniagara.blogspot.ca/2013/07/what-to-do-what-to-do.html

    Like

Leave a reply to Preston Haskell Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.