A Foreword by Niagara At Large publisher Doug Draper
Tim Hudak and his Conservatives always seem to have found comfort zone in Ontario’s rural communities, including Hudak’s own Niagara West-Glanbrook riding made up of Pelham, West Lincoln, Lincoln Grimbsy and rural stretches of Hamilton.
Rural communities in Niagara and other areas of Ontario have been a bedrock, core constituency for Hudak’s warmed over Mike Harris stew of tax and spending cuts, and disarming labour unions of any strength they may have left to stand up against employers – public or private – who are pleased to see the wage gap continue to widen between them and all the rest of us, lower down on the foodchain.
Clearly, the mess that the now-‘I’m-outa-here’ Liberal premier Dalton McGuinty has made of what might otherwise be heroic effort to introduce 21st century versions of wind and solar energy technology in Ontario, has become red meat for Hudak to throw at rural residents who have every reason to believe that McGuinty’s ill-conceived Green Energy legislation of a few years back gives them no say in where these facilities should be located.
So Hudak can play to this core group with more strength than he could even five years ago, and the Liberal government’s new premier, Kathleen Wynne, picking herself to also sit as Ontario’s minister of agriculture and rural affairs may not make a damn bit of difference.
At any rate, here is a media release and the complete text of the talk Ontario PC leader Tim Hudak delibered this February 26 to representatives of Ontario’s rural municipalities.
RURAL AND NORTHERN ONTARIO KEY TO OUR PROSPERITY
TORONTO – Better days lie ahead for our province, starting with a prosperous rural and Northern Ontario, PC Leader Tim Hudak today told the combined conference of the Rural Ontario Municipal Association and the Ontario Good Roads Association.
“I have a vision for a rural and Northern Ontario where we build, grow, harvest, forge and mine products in demand the world over,” Hudak said. “It’s a place with the best roads, bridges and transit systems, thriving agriculture and manufacturing sectors, and communities that can shape their own destinies.
“But realizing that vision requires a comprehensive, immediate and serious plan to rein in overspending and kick start private sector job creation,” Hudak added. “Every close call, every tough decision, every argument must be resolved on the basis of what it does to grow our economy and create jobs.”
To restore the key role for rural and Northern Ontario in a stronger provincial economy, Hudak said a PC government would:
End costly wind and solar power subsidies and restore local decision making over the placement of industrial wind farms
- Repeal the Far North Act to encourage job creation and economic development in the North
- Ensure all municipalities get a share of the provincial gas tax and enable them to put that revenue towards local transportation infrastructure projects
- Fix Ontario’s broken arbitration system that imposes big city wages and benefits agreements on small town circumstances, and
- Ensure the Endangered Species Act adheres to verifiable science – not political science.
“At the same time, we need create an attractive environment for investment through lower taxes, reliable and affordable energy rates and a globally competitive workforce,” Hudak stressed.
“It will require bold, confident and meaningful action to bring Ontario out of this debt and jobs crisis and toward stronger local economies and good jobs for rural and Northern Ontario.”
Notes for Remarks by Tim Hudak, MPP
Leader, the PC Party of Ontario
to the Combined Conference of the Rural Ontario Municipalities Association and the Ontario Good Roads Association
February 26, 2013
CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY
I think this year’s conference theme is very timely: “Adding Up The New Fiscal Reality”. It speaks to the crossroads we find ourselves at and the difficult choices all of us need to make.
If we make those difficult, but necessary choices, embrace the new fiscal reality, we can create an Ontario the world marvels at again.
That is the vision I have for our province.
An Ontario where everyone can wake up and have a good job to go to, or at least, the opportunity of finding one soon – especially in rural and northern Ontario where so many people have given up trying to find work.
An Ontario with a health care system that’s there for people when they need it – not inaccessible behind layers of bureaucracy – where you’ve got to fight like hell to get something done for a loved one.
An education system that properly prepares our children to succeed in an increasingly competitive world – by raising the bar in math, science, literacy and skilled trades.
A Province with the best roads, bridges and transit systems.
An Ontario where we build, grow, harvest, forge and mine things – selling products in demand the world over. Where our Ontario farmers – world leaders in innovation – combine with fertile farmland and the confidence to invest making us the bread basket of North America.
That’s the Ontario I want to build. The Ontario we all want to build. And my PC Caucus colleagues and I have spent every day for a year now, proposing bold ideas for how to do it – by reining in overspending, and getting our economic fundamentals right to grow our economy in small towns as well as large.

Tim Hudak and wife Deb Hutton, who was an advisor in Mike Harris’s inner circle before taking on a job at Hydro One under Eleanor Clithrroe, who (in Clithroe’s case) was later a subject of questionable handling of pubilc money going to that agency.
But before we start prescribing solutions, I’d like to take a look at how we came to this “new fiscal reality”. It wasn’t by accident. It was through a series of deliberate choices that weakened Ontario.
A deliberate choice to sacrifice Ontario’s traditional advantage of low energy rates, for unaffordable subsidies to wind and solar power. A deliberate choice to turn government into our only growth industry – adding 300,000 jobs to the government payroll at the same time we lost 300,000
manufacturing jobs in your home towns. A deliberate choice to divide Ontario along rural and urban lines. And a deliberate choice to spool out red tape at a cost to our economy of $11 billion a year.
A series of deliberate choices that made Ontario first in debt, and last in jobs.
So here is my deliberate choice: I will strengthen Ontario.
People are longing for change. The province they live in can no longer provide the future they hoped for. The answers to our problems aren’t hard to figure out. They’re just hard to do. But if we dare to try, there will be benefits for all.
It starts with only as much government as we can afford. To protect the things we care about we must reduce the size, cost, and role of government. Anyone who tells you they can eliminate a $12 billion deficit without reducing spending is either naïve – or thinks you are.
We will actually reduce government spending. It needs to be done.
I won’t measure success by the number of public sector employees, the amount of money spent or the number of government programs. That’s the old way of thinking. I’m ready to take a bold new approach. Every close call, every tough decision, every argument gets resolved on the basis of what it does to grow our economy and create jobs.
I’ll approach government the same way Ontarians approach their businesses. We will set clear goals, measure outcomes and then reward the individuals who help us achieve those outcomes. We will create a leaner public service that delivers more value for less money.
My plan focuses on the core services that matter most. Government is in a lot of businesses it has no business being in in the 21st century. So we’ll look at getting out.
We keep a massive bureaucracy to dictate the size, shape and shelving of alcohol bottles – while rationing life-saving medicines on the Ontario formulary. We have government employees serving
drinks at the blackjack table – but we’re unable to provide over a million people with a doctor, the majority of them in rural and Northern Ontario.
It’s got to change.
But it’s not enough to simply say we can cut our way to prosperity. It’s necessary, but we need to grow the economy too. So as Premier, jobs will be job number one, and two and three.
I make no mistake about who will pull us of this ditch. If businesses in your communities do well, then Ontario does well.
We have a comprehensive plan to make Ontario attractive for investment and job creation.
We need to lower taxes on businesses so that they can invest and create jobs in Ontario. Now, some will say that “tax cuts” mean the government will have less money to spend.
They’re wrong. They ignore a proven reality: With tax relief comes economic growth. More people working again means more revenue coming into the treasury.
And we must make the best use of the tax revenue coming in. Case in point: the gas tax. Right now, you pay the same gas tax whether you live in West Toronto or West Lincoln. But you only get money
back if you’ve got a subway or a bus. Last week my colleague John Yakabuski from Renfrew-
Nipissing-Pembroke tabled a bill to fix this problem. His bill would see all Ontario communities get a share of the gas tax and put it toward whatever their local transportation infrastructure needs are – not what Queen’s Park says they should be.
We must also lift the heavy hand of government and clear the roadblocks for businesses across our province to succeed. We’ll start by reducing Ontario’s 300,000 regulations by at least a third.
Government shouldn’t make rules just because it can or just to keep bureaucrats busy.
What does that mean for your communities? Here are some examples: We will repeal the Far North qa Act that seeks to freeze Northern Ontario in time as if it were a museum. The future prosperity I see for Northern Ontario will be built on development and job creation in the North for the North.
We’ll also address issues with the Endangered Species Act. In 2003 there were 19 species listed, today there are 121. We have all heard stories of the Bobolink preventing farmers from harvesting their hay, of the Grey Rat Snake preventing business development in Eastern Ontario, of the Wood Turtle preventing the forestry sector in the North. The problem is that these rules aren’t working for anyone.
They aren’t serving to actually protect endangered species, and they aren’t allowing our agriculture and business sector to grow. We will ensure the ESA adheres to the principles of verifiable science – not political science.
Ontario also has restrictive rules that make our workforce less competitive and cost us jobs. In a global market, where capital is mobile, employers and employees need the ability to be flexible. Demand is constantly shifting and the ability of businesses to turn on a dime in response to a new opportunity or a tough competitor is crucial. A workforce bound by outdated labour laws such as ours stands in the way of that.
We can’t attract innovative and cutting edge companies or grow our own if we’re using the tools of the last century. You would never imagine using a rotary phone or a typewriter in your business anymore, so why do we put up with labour laws that from the same era? So we’ll put an end to provincial closed tendering laws that force you to use the same union for all your work driving up costs for local governments and taxpayers.
We’ll also fix a broken arbitration system that imposes big city wages and benefits agreements on small town assessment bases.
And we’ll empower workers to make the choices that are right for them. Unions have a role, when people choose to join them freely. Deny that right – deny that choice – it hurts people and it hurts Ontario. If we trust someone enough to let them vote for their mayor, their premier, why do we think they aren’t sophisticated enough to vote whether to join a union or not?
We also need to take a sensible approach to energy in our province. Energy used to be an economic strength for Ontario. For decades we could offer businesses and families affordable and reliable energy rates. Now our rates are among the highest in North America – and they keep climbing.
We need to restore energy as an economic fundamental, instead of doubling down on failed expensive industrial wind farm experiments. That’s why we will restore local decision making because municipal councils have the right to decide what’s best for their communities.
Businesses need to make the tough decisions and they will choose to locate in jurisdictions where business costs are lower, approvals happen faster and the government treats them with respect, not suspicion.
The future prosperity I will build will be based on a freer market and smaller government, not on the failed ideology of the past decade. We have a new fiscal reality and I am prepared to take a new approach.
Anyone who’s been faced with a crisis or emergency will tell you that being cautious and incremental will not save you. This crisis requires bold, confident and meaningful action in the direction you know is right. If we have the will, leadership and courage of our convictions, we can set ourselves on a new path.
J’ai beaucuoup d’espoir pour ce province et tout notre citoyens.
I have a tremendous hope for this province and all its people.
I see an Ontario of great destiny. A province that is going to rise again.
And my Ontario includes rural and northern Ontario. It includes small towns, prosperous farmers and a
resurgence of manufacturing.
So here’s my message today:
To the business owner in Essex struggling to hang on, hang on a little longer.
To those who have packed up and moved away from Peterborough County, come back home.
To the moms and dads in Kenora who are working two jobs each, struggling to make ends meet, hope
is on the way.
Ontario’s comeback is about to start.
We’ve done it before. We’ve risen up, dusted ourselves off and ushered in a new era of prosperity.
I intend to make sure we do it again.
I will not run from tough decisions.
I will protect the things we care about.
I will pursue bold ideas and an agenda to inspire.
I will do what needs to be done.
So to the provinces that have taken our skilled workers and entrepreneurs; To the states that have taken Northern, Eastern and Southwestern Ontario’s factories and biggest
employers; To the countries that have taken our investors and hold our debt;
Hear me when I say: We are on our way back. On reviens. Ontario will lead again.
Thank you. Merci tous.
(Niagara At Large encourages all visitors to this site to share their views on this post or any other posts NAL has posted. Divergent views are most welcome in the spirit of NAL’s goal to operate as a virtual town hall for discussing and debating issues of interest and concern to our communities and countries across the greater Niagara region and beyond.)


Double speak for we will run up more debt and make individuals and families pay for it, while we line the pockets of the rich.
LikeLike
After watching Queen’s Park recently I shuddered at the thought of that loud mouth female Conservative ever being in power in Ontario.
She was nasty, arrogant and Ignorantly attacked Ms Wynne who I am not a fan of but she did not deserve the bullying of this ranting idiot.
Actually she was playing up to the cameras and I truly hope she get the same response from the peoples of Ontario as she got from me UTTER DISGUST FOR HER DISPLAY OF BULLYING……
LikeLike
Why doesn’t he just go away. Today the Star said he will fight the teachers. Guess he forgot his parents were teachers. With all of his dumb policies I think he must be trying to lose any upcoming election on purpose.
LikeLike
Tim Hudak and anything he says isn’t worth commenting on. He should follow McGuinty into obscurity.
LikeLike
Further to my above while watching the goon squad memories of the Mike Harris times gushed back , memories of them ranting how everyone else was wrong and how they were going to change everything……
I remember AND LEST WE FORGET
(1) “WE WILL NOT CLOSE HOSPITAL or PRIVATIZE HEALTH CARE”
(a)Then proceeded to shut down hospitals throughout the Province
(b)Take health care administration out of the very capable hands of local people and set up systems of appointed stooges like the NHS
(2) “WE WILL ENHANCE EDUCATION STANDARDS”
(a) Fought with school boards and imposed budgets they were unable to follow.
(a) Cut back on the funding of school maintenance to a point where buildings roofs actually leaked
(3) WE WILL ELIMINATE UNIONS and PRIVATIZE most if NOT ALL SOCIAL PROGRAMS.
(a) Cut back Welfare funding by over 20%
(4) ALL THIS WHILE CUTTING CORPORATE TAXES …Thus:PUTTING THE REVENUE ONUS ONTO THE SHOULDERS OF TAXPAYERS (Mostly the Middle Class) BY CUTTING SOCIAL PROGRAMS
AND THIS IS JUST THE TIP OF WHAT THEY DID TO FOSTER BITTERNESS AND HATRED AMONG THE ONTARIO PEOPLE AND START THE SLIDE INTO INFAMY AND ONTARIO BEING A “Have-NOT PROVINCE”
IF WE THE ONTARIO PEOPLE THINK HUDAK AND HIS GANG HAVE CHANGE SINCE THE HARRIS ERA THEN THINK AGAIN FOR IT IS THE SAME OLD RHETORIC THAT GOT HARRIS AND YES HIS CLONE HUDAK ELECTED THEN AND ONTARIO WILL ONCE AGAIN RUE THE DAY ONTARIO PEOPLE EVER LISTENED TO THEIR FRASER INSTITUTE CORPORATE PROPAGANDA.
.
LikeLike
While I feel that green energy should be an objective, I do feel the design of the plan was wrong in so many ways it would be laughable if it were not at the expense of hard earned tax dollars. I am not talking about the government earning it, but rather the actual tax payer. This feeling is consistent with respect to pretty much everything the McSquinty government did during their tenure.
With respect to Hudak. While I don’t believe he will deliver, there isn’t much I see in his speech that I don’t agree should happen. We spend too much on government services
What I wish he would have addressed, is transparency and how he is going to increase it so that we don’t run, hopefully, into the same mess with him as we did with McSquinty (ORNGE, EHealth…).
What I don’t see is addressing WASTE in goverment.
Re: Unions – Doesn’t anyone agree that union demands have become a little outrageous in some situations and the the union may be acting out of self-interest as opposed to the interest of its members? That perhaps unions have served their purpose and now are more or less justifying their existence?
With respect to wealth creation, while taxing the rich is popular rhetoric, the fact remains the wealthy are penalized by our tax system and that having people strive to earn is a good thing for all. If it were not for the wealthy this country would be in worse shape than you can imagine because we all know that the majority of citizens consume more in services than they will ever contribute in the form of taxes. Ever think about that! I personally think there should be a cap on how much one can be taxed in any given year not that I would benefit. The wealthy, in large part, are entrepreneurs and business people who take the risk, design the plan and execute it to the benefit of the employees required and our society through the taxes generated. Without it where would we be? The government can not hire all citizens of this country.
Just some thoughts on some of the dialogue. Just sayin……
LikeLike
Sorry mistyped. re: wealth creation – should read “I would NOT benefit from”.
LikeLike
Mr. Middleton, I concur that some processes are wasteful in government, but what risks are these wealthy philanthropists taking in Ontario? If their “Penalization” is holding them back I would be happy to climb into that penalty box. I am pretty sure that I watched Mark Carney plead with corporate Canada to invest some of the billions in profit they were holding back this past fall. The Liberals never properly climbed out from under the Harris mess, but Hudak will put us right back into that hole. Money and Prosperity are not the sum of Ontario’s potential are they? Is that all we expect of government these days? Clear a path to wealth for those of us who aren’t too lazy, complacent, enslaved by unions bosses, wasting time on the environment, etc. The government has been plenty fiscally conservative for quite a while, can we try Something different yet?
LikeLike
Speaking as a business person who has experienced success AND failure, the risk is simple. There are no guarantees that even the best ideas will succeed and that is ultimately the risk that entrepreneurs who make up a large percentage of 1%ers accepts.
So imagine if no one wanted to accept this risk. The government can’t hire us all! As it stands all levels of government penalize success with progressively increased taxes. True Story: I know people who don’t work to create more wealth because they are comfortable and don’t feel the need to create companies just to pay taxes. As a result they have laid off staff and are basically coasting. They are capable of doing more, but don’t. Currently the 1%ers pay 20% of all the income tax collected, plus they spend more on consumption and property related taxes. I think we have asked enough from them.
Yes there are billions being withheld by corporations, but what are they supposed to do. Spend it without regard to their shareholders (union, government, individual pension funds…..). That’s what a government would do, not a business. If it doesn’t make sense to spend it you don’t.
Something different…… ahhhh yes that would be ideal! How about more accountability, fewer wasteful government programs, greater transparency and restricting union related costs. All of these things added up would eliminate all government level deficits and put us on the right path, but they are too difficult because at the end of the day politicians are politicians and they will do what is necessary to get elected.
Sadly Just Sayin……..
LikeLike