By Doug Draper
Are you a retired person out there trying to make ends meet on Canada’s ‘Old Age Security pension? And if you are, did you enjoy an increase of 10 per cent in your pension payments last year?

Canada's federal members of parliament and senators get piggish about pension hikes for themselves while many of the rest of us struggle to get by.
Of course not!
As a follow-up to a report Niagara At Large posted on this site on April 17 entitled; ‘Ontario Being Pushed To Improve Pensions For Seniors In Need’, it would be a gross oversight on NAL’s part not to point out that Canada’s federal government had no bones about rubber stamping a 10 per cent hike in pensions for MPs and our un-elected (should summarily have their jobs abolished) senators.
This “gold-plated pension fund,” as a recent story in The Toronto Star called it, has been approved in apparent total denial of the realities facing many of the rest of us out here who are struggling to recover from the worst recession that has rocked the economy this country and others since the Great Recession of the 1930s.
At what point, does Canada’s government totally lose site of the fact that while it is feathering the nest bed for federal politicians for their retirement future, people jobs have been lost out here to the tune of double-digit joblessness rates in Niagara and other regions of the country, and many of those who do have jobs or pensions are holding them with minimal raises and benefits to keep up with the soaring costs of food, fuel and other basic needs.
And what gives with Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his Conservatives? Didn’t they promise to come to Ottawa to clean the place of irresponsible spending and lighten the burden for the little guy?
Well, apparently that promise is history because while they have fattened MP’s pension funds (Harper, by the way, now stands to collected an annual pension, paid for by us, of $178,000), the spending cuts have come in the form of day-care services for low-income families, health-care payments to the provinces, little or no assistance to students struggling to pay for their college and university educations, and – of course – pensions.
The increase in Canada Pension Plan benefits went up about half a percentage point this past January and the Old Age Security pension for people 65 years of age or older remains unchanged at $516.96 per month.
But Niagara MPs like Rick Dykstra, the Conservative MP for St. Catharines, and Rob Nicholson, the Niagara Falls MP for Niagara Falls and Harper’s Minister of Justice, don’t have to worry about that do they. They’ll continue to enjoy a good feed from the public trough long after they are out of public office.
Maybe someone ought to ask the justice minister where the justice is in a 10-per-cent pension hike for MPs and senators, and pennies for all those many Canadians (a good half of us) who aren’t fortunate enough to have a robust pension plan to pay into through their jobs?
Any maybe more of us ought to be outraged out here and showing it by flooding our MPs with phone calls and emails complaining about this. But how much of us are paying attention and how many are spending more time watching hockey finals and reading People magazine.
I’ve got an old saying on my office wall; “If you are not outraged, you are not paying attention.”
Please weigh in on this one with your comments. And to our American neighbours, some of whom I know are following this site, feel free to express your own comments visa vi frustrations over entitlements to your elected representatives versus what the rest of us get.
(Click on www.niagaraatlarge.com for Niagara At Large and more news and commentary on matters of interest and concern to our greater binational Niagara region.)
I have never made as much working as these clowns will make for not working.
LikeLike
Thanks Doug
I have contacted Mr. Nicholson’s Office in Niagara Falls on several occassions and have been told by his person that no one lives on OAS and that OAS is only meant as a supplement to Private Pensions, Personal Savings and Investments. In anger and disgust I hung up on this caring person not once but twice.
As it was disclosed only about 17% of Ontarians enjoy a pension from employment and in many cases any saving are long gone to inflation, as for investments they flew out the window with the economic upheaval.
Liberal, Conservative like Ralph Nader said What is the difference? NONE ….For they are both own by Corporations operating in and outside Canada.
LikeLike
I agree with Joseph Somers and the earlier poster … I know I will not enjoy a retirement whatsoever, even though I’ve always worked. There will be nothing left for me once I reach that age and if there is, there won’t be enough to survive, so like more and more people, it will be Freedom 95 for me.
LikeLike
We need a separate group that has veto power on spending. This group needs to be unpaid and have no personal gain from their position. They must be clear of all conflicts of interest with their decisions.
Of course, we need that for Toronto’s City Council as well as the province and the feds.
LikeLike
I make the following assumptions because Parliament has failed to provide real figures.
Assume an MP retires at age 55 and lives, like most, to age 85. He has survivor benefits on his pension for his wife who lives another 5 years. We pay pension of perhaps $150,000 yearly for 35 years and the MP only served for a few years. That is $150,000 x 35 years = $5,250,000 each for 307 MPs at a time.
That is $5,250,000 x 307 = $1,611,750,000 (Billions) for the current MPs. They work for the pension not the salary.
Suppose we toss out MPs on average every 5 years. That is 17 rotations of MPs during one lifetime of 85 years so $1,611,750,000 x 17 rotations of new MPs = $27,399,750,000 in pension money to MPs during one lifetime.
If they just gifted themselves with an additional 10% in pension raises, it will cost us $2,739,975,000 more (that is billions)
The current crop of MPs will cost us $1.6 billion dollars in pensions for just a few years work. We cannot afford to give them employment when they set up this kind of bank heist. (all figures demonstrative and estimated only) $5,250,000 each for 307 MPs at a time plus Senators.
LikeLike
Pingback: Dispatch 10: The Claw is Back – (Final) Part 6 | Kaffir Kanuck