An Open Letter To Niagara College Teachers – If You Care About Your Students, Please Don’t Risk Destroying What Is Left Of Their Academic Year!

 From Doug Draper

 I was checking out at the service desk of a retail store some three or four weeks ago when the cashier, who has been reading my columns years, asked me what I was writing about that week.

A Student Centre? This campus of Niagara College may have no students at all taking classes on it if the college teachers' union moves forward with a strike in the days ahead. Photo by Doug Draper

“Well, I’m writing about the possibility of a college teachers’ strike,” I said, “and I’m calling the piece – ‘College teachers who strike this time should be fired.’”

At that point, a young girl who was also working at the service desk turned around and told me that she is a student at Niagara College, and that about the last thing she and her fellow students need right now is a teachers’ strike. All three of us – the cashier, the young girl and I – got carried away in a discussion about this until I turned around and noticed a man behind me, weighed down with a couple of fairly heavy items, waiting to check out. I immediately apologized to him for keeping him waiting.

“That’s okay,” he said. “I have a son in college and we are worried about this too.”

Worried indeed!

These are far from the only folks I’ve talked to in recent weeks who feel the same way.

As a columnist who still manages to have some reach across this region and receives a good deal of email from readers, my poll (however unscientific it may be) suggests that if college teachers in Niagara and the more than 20 other college campuses across this province go on strike this February 17th, you will get almost no public support. If the views your students and the public who pay your salaries and benefits mean anything to you, you are more likely to see any respect you have left as educators creamed if you move forward with a strike. 

 But apparently that doesn’t matter to the representatives of the Ontario Public Services Employees Union for college teachers across this province. They are reportedly urging you to vote this February 10th against an offer by the colleges’ presidents to accept a “final offer” for a 5.9 per cent salary increase that, over the next three year, would raise the salaries of the most senior college instructors to more than $103,000 a year.

In the real world outside the classroom and off the campus, any raise at all might seem like it was God sent in an economy where many of the rest of us are working longer hours for no raises at all or are agreeing to reductions in our salaries and benefits, just to keep our jobs!

But that obviously doesn’t mean much of a fig to your union.

Your union is demanding a 7.5 per cent increase in wages (2.5 per cent per year) over the next three years, and if the province and colleges don’t cough it up, they are determined to have you out of your classrooms, beating the pavement on picket lines at a time when the academic year of some 150,000 full-time students and more than 300,000 part-time students possibly goes to waste.

 The students, who stand the most to lose, are always the pawns in your union negotiation games, aren’t they? Your union almost always holds a strike deadline for sometime toward the middle or last half of their academic year, when maximum hard will be done to their year. You never set your strike for June or July, and why?

Well it doesn’t take a college graduate to tell you why. It is because the damage you could potentially do to struggling young students who are going into debt paying your wages is your biggest bargaining chip. That is why. And that is obscene. Especially these days when many of these young are finding it hard to find summer jobs and come from families of people who have lost jobs at GM, John Deere, the paper and steel mills around here, etc., etc.

 Does that mean anything o you? As you vote for your union’s demand for a wage increase many others in this region can only dream of, does the significance of that or what it means matter anything to? Or do you just want the raise? Do you see it as a once every three or four year entitlement because, after all, you are sacred. You are a teacher.

That’s the message I got from the email I’ve received from some of your colleagues since I wrote that column I mentioned earlier up about firing college teachers who strike. Instead of any of them showing any concern for might become of the students and their academic year if there is a strike, one of them actually had the nerve to say that their contribution to the community was worth more than that of firefighters or police.

 I challenged that guy to go before those groups and declare that, and I have not heard back from him since. Frankly, I don’t think he could make an argument for placing the value of a college teacher above that of a plumber or the people who, for closer to minimum wage, shovel snow off our roads or collect our household waste.

So let’s get down to basics this time and consider the damage a strike of this kind would be doing to young people who have sacrificed so much for tuition and the outrageous price they pay for your text books – many of them produced by you and your colleagues – at a time of severe economic recession.

Is there any chance you in the teaching profession, at a time like this, could come to a conclusion that you feel the rest of the community’s pain and might even be willing to forfeit a pay raise for one or two years to help relieve the burden on the rest of us?

Apparently not, because the college presidents have put an offer on the table for a pay hike that few others in the rest of this world could dream of. But that is not enough for your union.

This Wednesday, Feb. 10, your union wants you to vote ‘No’ to the college presidents’ offer. They would rather have you go out on strike that potentially does the same kind of damage to tens-of-thousands of young college students that the York University strike did to students last year.

And yah, yah, yah. I’ve heard all the union’s rhetoric that it cares about the students and doesn’t really want a strike. One of my first assignments for a daily paper in this region was a college teachers threat to strike some 30 years ago – I can still see them carrying a fake coffin on the Welland campus of Niagara college – and I have heard all of these talking points before.

But this is not 30 years ago or even four years ago when we naively thought that the economy would just keep growing and growing.

This is a new reality we are living and struggling to survive in and a strike by your union right now, I would submit, could mean the beginning of the end of your union as any kind of credible force in this province.

 If you go out on strike this time, you are setting yourselves up for another Mike Harris to come along and say, ‘Alright, this time I am going to break their necks.’ And this time, you won’t have journalists like me to sympathies with you.

This time, more people are likely to sympathize with the students that would be used as nothing more than a pawn in a strike, and with the ordinary taxpayer than is having enough trouble, as it is, with keeping up to pay your wages.

For all of our sake, show some social responsibility when you vote on the college presidents’ offer this February 10th and say yes to it. Let the young people you are there to serve get on with their education.

Click on www.niagaraatlarge.com  now for m0re news and commentary by Doug Draper and other contributors on issues of concern to our region. 

2 responses to “An Open Letter To Niagara College Teachers – If You Care About Your Students, Please Don’t Risk Destroying What Is Left Of Their Academic Year!

  1. Thanks Doug for saying what a lot of us think.

    Like

  2. Maybe Ontario College teachers -and all civil servants- should quickly grab a pay Freeze, before McGuinty wakes up and realises how much Ontario is indebted ….

    Here’s a UK columnist reporting about the recent dramatic Irish Budget cuts:

    WE HAVE A LOT TO LEARN FROM IRELAND
    The biggest lesson is that, if a country has to impose austerity, it should do so swiftly
    ~Hamish McRae, Wednesday, 16 December 2009
    http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/hamish-mcrae/article1841891.ece

    Britain has a lot to learn about fiscal policy from Ireland. To Irish civil servants, property owners, taxpayers, the unemployed, indeed to almost anyone living there that might provoke a hollow laugh. Ireland has had an even more spectacular boom and bust cycle than the UK. Its banks are in even worse shape. The property slump is even deeper. And the fiscal deficit is pretty much as bad as ours.

    So what should we learn? Ireland last week moved to correct its fiscal mistakes, whereas we are still in denial about them. Just as important, the austerity budget it brought in seems to have been largely accepted by the Irish people. And if past experience is any guide, this budget will start to lay the basis for a return to solid growth.

    The Irish budget was announced on the same day as our pre-budget report and as a result received rather less attention here than it deserved. The bones of it were a cut in public sector pay ranging from 5 % at the bottom end to 15 % at the top (and a 20 % cut for the Taoiseach, Brian Cowen), a cut in other state benefits including, controversially, child benefit, and the introduction of a new carbon tax. Most other taxes, however, have remained broadly the same and the 12.5 % corporation tax, seen by many as one of the keys to Ireland’s attractiveness as a destination for inward investment, is untouched.

    There is something else. Ireland has started its austerity programme while the economy is still forecast to shrink. Unlike the UK it is not putting off cuts in spending until there is more evidence of growth, our government’s argument for not cutting the deficit next year.

    You might say that this is because Ireland has less leeway than the UK in increasing its borrowing. Its debt has been downgraded and, as part of the eurozone, it is unable to devalue its currency and reduce the debt burden that way. But it may well be that when a country reaches some level of indebtedness, further state borrowing becomes ineffective at boosting demand because everyone knows it is not sustainable. As a result, you are better to get on with it and hope that it is politically acceptable.

    It seems to be so, for the budget has been generally well-received. The Greens are on board, thanks in part to the carbon tax. There is real and understandable concern about the cut in child benefit and the fact that even poorly-paid public service workers have to take a cut. But public reaction has not been so adverse, perhaps because many private sector workers have had to take pay cuts already and so in a way what is happening now to the public sector employees matches what has already happened to them. There was a one-day public-sector workers’ strike but a second one was called off. Ireland has a long tradition of reasonable co-operation between the government and the unions and these wage cuts certainly are stress-testing that. But it has been tested several times before.

    The scale of the challenge remains daunting. I had not realised quite what a catastrophe the collapse of the property market had brought to the Irish banks until I read a new best-seller in Ireland, “The Bankers – How the Banks Brought Ireland to its Knees”, by Shane Ross, a journalist and independent senator in Dublin. Irish bankers were paying themselves three or more times as much as their counterparts in the UK, while posting profits that can now be seen as non-existent or worse. There was a cosy collusion between the bankers and the property developers to lend more and hence show even higher banking returns.

    The over-reliance on construction was singled out by the finance minister, Brian Lenihan, when he presented his budget. Because the Irish construction industry was so much bigger in relative terms than in the UK, the impact on the job market has been much more serious. Unemployment is already 12.5 % and forecast to rise to around 14.5 % next year. Within the Eurozone, only Spain is worse.

    But Ireland, unlike the UK, has not damaged its attractiveness as a destination for inward investment. Irish taxpayers have just as much reason to be angry at the country’s bankers as do British, indeed more so, but the country has not sought to bring in additional taxation on foreign bankers working in the country. It is extremely important, when seeking to attract foreign investment, that tax structures should be predictable. That is a test that Ireland has passed and Britain has failed.

    If that is the first lesson, there are, I suggest several others. One is that the principal burden of austerity measures has to be on the spending side rather than the taxation side. Since so much of any state’s costs are in terms of wages to its employees, tackling that must be a priority. Politically it appears difficult, but less so if it is perceived as fair by the electorate at large. One of the most notable features of the past year in both the UK and Ireland has been the way the hardship has fallen disproportionately on the private sector. Sharing the pain means bringing similar discipline to the public sector and the electorate in Ireland seems to accept that.

    But the biggest lesson surely is that if a country has to impose austerity, it should do so swiftly. The economic case for this was noted above – that once deficits are seen as unsustainable they cease to boost demand – and while the economists’ computer models don’t spew out that result, the experience of many countries, including Ireland in 1987, does so. The austerity programme then, laid the basis for the 20-year boom that followed. It could happen again. Indeed I personally believe it will happen again – and that is not at all to do with the fact that this newspaper is owned by an Irish company or that I was mostly brought up there. In three years’ time Ireland will again be a fast-growing economy, have its deficit under control, and will again be admired for its enterprise. As for the politics of it all, the comment of Brendan Keenan in the Irish Independent yesterday deserves a wider audience:

    “The UK has postponed correction until growth comes. That is normal economics, but it may yet prove bad politics. Fianna Fail politicians were very doubtful that the Republic could stand another dose of the same medicine in 2011. There may yet be widespread industrial unrest, but a lot of the heavy lifting has been done.”
    -30-
    h.mcrae@independent.co.uk

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.