“These women were denied the chance to speak, chastised for holding paper, and then arrested for quietly expressing their views. That is not how a democratic government should treat the voices of its citizens.” – Canadian Constitution Foundation Director of Litigation Christine Van Geyn
A News Release from the Canadian Constitution Foundation
Posted July 31st. 2025 on Niagara At Large
(A Brief Foreword by Niagara At Large reporter/publisher Doug Draper – Niagara At Large will have more news and commentary on this developing story in the days ahead.)
NIAGARA FALLS — The Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF) has filed a constitutional challenge in support of a group of women who were arrested for silently protesting during a Niagara Falls City Council meeting on June 17.
The applicant, Lauren O’Connor, was among the demonstrators arrested for holding small paper signs which read “The Women of Ontario Say No” to advocate for stronger accountability for local officials facing criminal charges.
After being denied the chance to speak as a delegation, members of the advocacy group Women of Ontario Say No (WOSN) attended the council meeting and held the signs non-disruptively in their laps.
Mayor James Diodati refused to begin proceedings until the signs were put away, citing the Decorum Policy for Public Meetings which bans all signs and “symbolic materials” inside council chambers. Police were called when the women refused, and three of them, including Ms. O’Connor, were arrested for trespassing. No charges were laid.
Banning all signs and symbols is an unjustified and extreme limit on free expression. Courts have previously ruled that governments must use the least restrictive means possible when limiting constitutional rights, and in this case, the city’s response was not only excessive but failed to meet the legal test of proportionality under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
CCF Director of Litigation Christine Van Geyn has twice written to the City of Niagara Falls requesting it withdraw the sign ban or face legal consequences, but no response was issued.
“These women were denied the chance to speak, chastised for holding paper, and then arrested for quietly expressing their views,” said Van Geyn. “That is not how a democratic government should treat the voices of its citizens. Banning signs is an attempt to ban certain ideas outright, and is a flagrantly unconstitutional violation of the free expression guaranteed to Canadians by the Charter.”
This is the first legal challenge funded by the CCF’s Censorship Defence Fund, established to fight speech restrictions at the municipal level. In June, Canada’s Most Censorious Bylaws,
Notice of Application
About the Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF)
Our Mandate – The CCF’s primary objective is to ensure that government power does not infringe on the rights and freedoms of Canadians, or disrupt the principles of Canadian federalism. The CCF advances these objectives by promoting civic engagement, awareness, and education regarding contemporary issues and developments in Canadian constitutional law. The CCF also initiates and intervenes in high-profile court cases, where it advocates against government overreach and urges courts to adhere to the written text and scheme of Canada’s Constitution.
For more on the Canadian Constitution Foundation, click on – Home – Canadian Constitution Foundation
For a related stories on this issue, click on – https://globalnews.ca/news/11309229/niagara-falls-legal-challenge-women-holding-signs-meeting/
Three women arrested in Niagara Falls for protesting city councillor charged with abuse
Group wanted to address accountability.pdf
NIAGARA AT LARGE Encourages You To Join The Conversation By Sharing Your Views O This Post In The Space Following The Bernie Sanders Quote Below.
“A Politician Thinks Of The Next Election. A Leader Thinks Of The Next Generation.” – Bernie Sanders
Niagara At Large 
M Strange should take a leave until his charges come to a conclusion.
LikeLike