Ford’s Bill 17 Ignores The Real Barriers To Housing While Scapegoating Green Standards

A Statement by Phil Pothen, Land Use and Land Development program manager for the citizens advocacy group Environmental Defence

Posted May 15h, 2025 on Niagara At Large

Toronto – With Bill 17, the Ontario government is once again choosing to ignore the most important causes of our housing shortage while scapegoating municipal policies that can actually help to improve construction efficiency and lower housing costs.

The government has been warned for years that it cannot end the housing shortage – especially the shortage of family-sized homes – without producing them in different, more efficient formats and building locations.

That means removing  provincial restrictions that are blocking mid-rise, stick-frame apartment buildings on existing streets and infrastructure inside currently low-rise  neighbourhoods.

It also means halting inefficient development – like McMansion  rebuilds and low-density sprawl – that has been squandering construction capacity.

Instead of fixing these problems, Bill 17 focuses on changes to process like extending MZO (ministerial zoning orders) powers to the infrastructure minister, while leaving in place or worsening the perverse incentives to build inefficiently.

Some of the measures proposed in Bill 17 – like deferring development charges  – could/help build smarter and faster if they were applied selectively to infill, mid-rise and multiplex housing. But the bill’s current language would apply these changes to sprawl and McMansion development as well.

Bill 17 also includes provisions that seem aimed at erasing municipal urban design rules and green building standards, imposing generic road-design  standards on urban and suburban streets and preventing urban design.

Those changes could actually make it harder to speed up housing—reversing progress toward more efficient construction and land use and the modes of transportation that support them.

*Background Information:*

*    While mid-rise infill development is the most efficient and cost effective way to build housing, Ontario’s existing laws undermine its natural advantages, so that very few mid-rise apartment buildings get built at all.

More information about the barriers to mid-rise housing construction can be found at – https://environmentaldefence.ca/the-big-sprawl-the-gtha-has-more-than-enough-land-designated-for-development/ shows that there is room in existing neighbourhoods and built-up areas for vast numbers of labour-efficient homes.

Existing neighbourhoods in the GTHA alone would need to add housing for roughly 10 million net new residents just to achieve the environmentally sustainable densities they should be aiming for anyway.

ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

NIAGARA AT LARGE Encourages You To Join The Conversation By Sharing Your Views On This Post In The Space Following The Bernie Sanders Quote Below.

“A Politician Thinks Of The Next Election. A Leader Thinks Of The Next Generation.” – Bernie Sanders

 

 

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.