Ontario Ministries Playing Games With The Environmental Bill Of Rights

A Submission from the Office of Ontario Environmental Commissioner Gord Miller

(Just as a postscript here, this Niagara At Large publisher, who made my way in journalism as an environment reporter for the majority of my 33 years in the field, would like to congratulate Gord Miller, once again, for performing his appointed role as a brave watchdog for the Ontario public. His critiques of government failings have always been fair and well-reasoned, and all of us in the public should be thankful for that by supporting this  person of integrity as Ontario’s environmental commissioner.

Gord Miller’s final quote in this submission, referring to the “level of disregard and contempt” some ministries of the current Ontario Liberal government of Dalton McGuinty are showing for the rights of the public to have full knowledge and input into environmental decision making is particularly startling. Where are you on this, St. Catharines MPP and Ontario Environment Minister Jim Bradley? – NAL publisher Doug Draper)

Toronto, September 19, 2012 – Ontario’s Environmental Commissioner says officials in the provincial government are defying the will of the Legislature and ignoring the public’s right to be involved in the development of environmental policy.

Environmental Commissioner Gord Miller

In Part I of his 2011/2012 Annual Report released today, Gord Miller highlighted the government’s obligations under Ontario’s Environmental Bill of Rights, also known as the EBR. “The EBR is one of the most significant environmental laws of our time,” says Miller. “It gives Ontarians a toolkit they can use to make sure Ontario ministries are listening to their concerns and protecting their right to a healthy environment. But a number of ministries are frustrating the public’s right to know and be involved in environmental protection.”

Miller says a key tool in the EBR toolkit is the Environmental Registry (www.ebr.gov.on.ca). Ministries that are covered by the EBR are required to post any environmentally significant proposals on this searchable on-line database. The posting of a proposal notice guarantees the public at least 30 days to comment on the proposed government initiatives, notification of the decision, and an explanation of how their comments were considered in the final decision.

Miller says a number of ministries are ignoring the requirements of the EBR and proceeding with far-reaching environmental plans, policies and programs without properly notifying and consulting the public.

• The Ministry of Energy didn’t post a full proposal notice on the Environmental Registry when it announced its review of the Feed-in Tariff program for renewable energy. Instead, it only posted an “information notice”, which does not give the public the right to have their comments considered, or the right to see how their comments were reflected in the final decision.
• The Ministry of Natural Resources didn’t notify and consult the public on its strategic policy document, Our Sustainable Future: A Call to Action, even though it gives overall direction for all of the ministry’s core activities and programs for years to come.

The report singles out the Ministry of Natural Resources for special criticism. “Over the past few years, it has increasingly evaded its obligations under the EBR. I think the Ministry of Natural Resources should be classified as a ‘chronic offender’ for its repeated refusal to post important proposals on the Environmental Registry. The Legislature should be offended by the ministry’s conduct.”

The cover of Gord Miller’s latest report to the province on environmental issues.

Miller says the flouting of the public’s rights extends beyond the refusal to use the Environmental Registry. Some important ministries still aren’t “prescribed” or covered by the Environmental Bill of Rights. For example, the Ministry of Infrastructure, which is in charge of legislation with clear environmental impacts like the Places to Grow Act, is still not prescribed.

Other ministries already subject to the EBR systematically deny every application from the public for a policy review or an investigation of suspected illegal activity. The Ministry of Northern Development and Mines and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing have in fact denied every application they have received since the Legislature gave the public these rights 18 years ago; the Ministry of Natural Resources has denied every application in the last five years.

Moreover, four years after the Ontario Divisional Court ruled that ministries must consider their Statements of Environmental Values (SEVs) when making decisions on all instruments (e.g., permits, approvals, licences) that are prescribed under the EBR, the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Ministry of the Environment still are not fully complying with this important requirement under the EBR.

“I am astounded by the level of disregard and contempt being shown to the statutory requirements of the Environmental Bill of Rights,” says the Environmental Commissioner. “Senior members of the Ontario Public Service are ignoring their responsibility to support and implement the will of the Legislative Assembly.”

Click to download Part l of the Environmental Commissioner’s full 2011 /2012 Annual Report, “Losing Touch.”

(Niagara At Large invites you to share your views on this post below, remembering that Niagara At Large only posts comments by individuals who also share their first and last names. We don’t host those who hide behind false names here. If you want to be an anonymous online flame thrower, go to Sun Media or some other blog site. Thanks for your consideration.)