By Randy Hillier, Ontario Conservative Party MPP
(Niagara At Large is posting the following commentary on concerns around G20 security operations by a Conservative MPP and contender last year for his party’s leadership. This site will be pleased to post other commentary by our provincial representatives on this important subject.)
It has been said that in war, truth is the first casualty. Yet in the wake of the Toronto G20 summit, it is clear that truth is an unwelcome intruder within the realm of politics as well.
Call it my inherent cynicism about politics or maybe put it down to my observation and experience, but the discussion and media coverage surrounding the G20 summit has been ignorant at best, or deliberately misleading at worst. The facts are clear when the political spin is replaced by reasoned evaluation.
The truth is that Dalton McGuinty arbitrarily suspended and abrogated our most sacred civil liberties — our freedoms and privacy — without discussion, debate or public awareness. The premier then justified this abuse of power by asserting that we needed law and order instead. Instead of choosing a more controlled and less populated location that would not be such a powerful magnet for the few juvenile anarchists, Stephen Harper agreed to host the G20 in a location that he had to have known would draw the greatest opposition and most violent response, therefore justifying an outrageous expenditure of public dollars and creating an army of police equipped with a siege mentality.
Both the provincial and federal governments now attempt to shirk responsibility for their actions by shifting blame to one another and to the police, who were acting under political orders. McGuinty refuses to apologize or call for an independent public inquiry. Harper hides behind the provincial jurisdiction of policing, even though it was his government that contracted their services on behalf of all Canadians. They both use the common theme that upholding law and order required usurping our civil liberties. Any elementary school student knows these are not mutually exclusive — in fact, they are wholly interdependent. As numerous failed dictatorships have proven, you cannot have law and order without civil liberties.
Can you imagine a society of law and order that does not respect the inherent civil liberties and freedom of mobility, association and assembly? What is law and order if you can be arrested and detained arbitrarily without reasonable and probable grounds? This is what happened on a large scale in Toronto. Stalin and Mao most assuredly would have agreed with McGuinty’s vision and views, that due process and evidentiary rules are optional. But law and order without civil liberties is the hallmark of despotism and tyranny, and are the stock in trade of injustice and evil.
Although there have been times of national crisis when civil liberties have been suspended, it has only ever occurred after a full and thoughtful debate — never in secrecy. It has happened when our country has been at war and our way of life under real threat. It has happened when civil unrest in Quebec led to bombings and the kidnapping and murder of public leaders; however, it was debated and voted upon with the public’s full knowledge of the War Measures Act.
The G20 has resulted in the largest mass arrest in our history of more than 1,000 Canadian citizens. But according to McGuinty, this startling fact does not justify or merit an inquiry. Over 700 of these people were detained, their freedom removed, and eventually released without charge, but this does not warrant public scrutiny either.
The largest ever mobilization of Canadian police in our history does not even deserve an open public review. More than $1 billion spent and we are supposed to be accepting and grateful. Freedom is secondary only to the very life we breathe, freedom is the most essential ingredient of humanity — to deprive one of his freedom is to suffocate our soul and nature. This must never be done arbitrary and only in times of great crisis.
McGuinty and Harper set the stage, created the environment and controlled the unfolding of these events, and together they have lowered the threshold of protecting our civil liberties. No longer are our freedoms and liberties only in peril during times of war or a direct threat upon our democratic institutions. They are now in peril every day we have political leaders such as this.
Randy Hillier, MPP Lanark, Frontenac, Lennox and Addington
(Click on Niagara At Large at www.niagaraatlarge.com for more news and commentary on matters of interest and concern to our greater binational Niagara region.)


What a breath of fresh air , although completely contrary to his Conservative leader Mr. Hudak, who blamed the victims of this apalling crackdown on Ontarians who have the democratic right to speak out! Thank you Mr. Hillier for speaking out for all who treasure democracies ” freedoms and liberties.
LikeLike
p.s. should read ‘democracy’s freedoms and liberties.’
LikeLike
Thank you Mr. Hillier. You seem to have a clear vision. Have you ever looked at the Canadian Constitution and read it? If not then for all of us that can not be heard read Sec 91 and Sec 92. To your surprise you will find that direct taxation is for Provincial purposes. (S92 sub 3) This eco tax is illegal it was passed by an agency not the government and slid in with the HST. If read in the whole, as the act must be, the Feds do not have the constitutional right to any direct taxation. Keep up the good work speaking up for the people. May God bless!
LikeLike
I am a just a little worried about this report. Is this the same Randy Hillier, whose manager in his last campaign was one Tristan Emmanuel of evangelical Christian Reform interests? Odd for NAL for posting things, but heck, has anyone but me read The Armaggeden Factor?
I am more than glad to be corrected, if I am confusing candidates.
My apologies upfront to Hillier, if he can tell me I am mistaken about his Conservative proclivities: I am always glad to be corrected. If not, Mr. Hillier, have you changed your alleged evangelical base, and just wish to Dalton bash? Whatever, I look forward to corrections and responses from readers.
LikeLike
Thanks for the many intelligent and thoughtful comments
To Glen
I have read the constitution -fully, You will see comments in the near future regarding my views on delegating powers of taxation to subordinate bodies of the legislative assembley.
To Gail
Iam the same individual. Tristan Eemmanuel was indeed my campaign manager in my leadership candidacy.
For the uninformed- christian values created and codified in law civil liberties and the concept of natural justice, maybe a quick refresher of Thomas Jefferson, Adam Smith, Fredrick Bastiat, and John Locke et al will enlighten your understanding.
I’ve not changed my base- I just don’t subscribe to or adhere to ignorant labels of convenience.
Check out my website http://www.randyhilliermpp.com for a more complete understanding of political philosophy.
PS. It wasn’t just Dalton who is deserving of my criticism or did you not read past the headline.
LikeLike
Hey, it’s Hiller again! He was the same man, along with Bill Murdoch who protested within the legislature over the passing of the HST, both of whom got themselves thrown out for doing so. I am not really a fan of many of the PC policies since Harris, but Randy Hillier in many ways is a refreshing voice to hear – in this piece, he is even openly critical of his federal counterparts and is not taking it from his provincial leader either … way to go, Hillier!
LikeLike
Gail, I think Hillier is a rural-based conservative libertarian in the true sense of the word. There are many ideas in this class I do not agree with, but it seems to me that the people who met and know Randy Hillier feel he is a very strong grassroots advocate for his constituents. I heard him speak on a number of issues … the PC Party needs the Randy Hilliers of the world, as does the NDP needs the Peter Kormos’ of this world.
LikeLike
Randy,
I went to your website expecting a political (re)education. All I saw was partisan, self promoting content a MPP (not a political philosopher). Can you suggest somewhere else I can go for a “more complete understanding of political philosophy”?
I welcome your criticisms of all aspects of the management of the G20 summit, especially policing. However, considering the comments made by the leader of your party, by sitting as a PC, are you not part of the problem?
LikeLike