A Commentary by John Bacher
The Strategic Plan exercise of the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority is scheduled to end with two significant dates. This is a December 66h deadline for public comments to be followed by a decision of the NPCA board of directors on December 18th. It is scheduled to be held in the boardroom of the NPCA on the top floor of 250 Thorold Road at 7 pm.

The St. John’s Conservation Area in the Niagara community of Thorold, Ontario, one of the conservation areas the Niagara Peninsula Conservatino Authority may ‘dispose’ of under its soon-to-be-approved ‘Strategic Plan’ for the future. Photo by Mike Dickman
It is always important for citizens to take part in decisions of government agencies that have an impact on the environment. However, this consultation has some unique and disturbing features. Rather than tweaking a fundamentally flawed strategic plan, the basic process, driven by characters such as lawyers for developers Victor Muratori and Edward Lustig, both who served on committees that helped churn out the report, needs to be abandoned. This needs to be clearly spelled out in submissions in the weeks ahead.
Given the nature of the committees involved in important matters such as property and development regulation, the horrific conclusions of the Strategic Plan such as the idea of “disposal” of existing conservation areas and the need for the NPCA to become more “customer friendly”, are not surprising. Such assumptions cannot be corrected by improvements, but only by the scrapping of the process.
Why there is no need for a Strategic Plan is that the basic framework which should be guiding the NPCA, apart from its legal requirements under the Conservation Authorities Act, is that the mission which is to be sought was much better established by the Niagara Region’s Water Quality Protection Strategy. Like the NPCA’s Strategic Plan, this process required those who took part to engage in voluminous reading and meetings. However, the people were not just those who were consultants and lawyers for developers. A lot of environmentally literate citizens with serious concerns for the environment took part.
One excellent recommendation by the Niagara Region’s water strategy was that the NPCA be required to conduct ecological restoration strategies for watersheds which it defined. These are now approximately half completed, with many in draft stages. Progress on completing them was essentially frozen by the Strategic Plan process disastrously unleashed two years ago.
A major issue in a shelved study for the Ten Mile. Beaverdams and Shriners Creek was the proposed urban boundary expansion for the City of Niagara Falls. While a watershed plan has no legal authority in deciding urban boundary expansions, the public discussions recognized that the issue would have a major impact on studied watersheds. The lawyer supporting this expansion, Ed Lustig, and a consultant for the development consortium, the North West Niagara Falls Landowners Group, Lisa Campbell, were both involved in the Strategic Plan panels.
The most disturbing aspect of the Strategic Plan is its call for the “disposal” of now protected areas that are owned by the NPCA. The ecological significance of these lands are disputed. They can be better appreciated however, if they are seen as part of a core network of mature forest areas, which are part of a larger natural heritage system.
The now shelved watershed plans can be revived in the wake of the death of the proposed Strategic Plan. Their assumptions are those that actually form the key part of the mandate of conservation authorities. This is that in the interest of water protection, forest cover in Ontario should be greatly expanded.
John Bacher is a veteran conservationist in Niagara, Ontario and a long-time member of the citizen group, Preservation of Agricultural Lands Society.
As John Bacher and others know, this NAL publisher Doug Draper agreed last year to participate voluntarility on a committee involved enhancing communications programs for the NPCA for this Strategic Plan. Doug Draper will share his own concerns around this Plan with NAL readers later.
(Niagara At Large invites you to share your views on this post. A reminder that we only post comments by individuals who share their first and last name with them.)
The St John’s Conservation Area is one of the two areas used by the schools’ Outdoor Education Program to teach students about the importance of conservation, habitat, ecology, and outdoor recreation. This in itself ought to make the NPCA think twice about disposing of the property whether it makes money or not.
LikeLike
You are right Ryder . I feel ALL Conservation areas should be just that outdoor teaching areas . As well they should befree to the people who can least afford the cost of entry to some of these areas ( Balls Falls as an example ) . There are people who will never experience Muskoka , but why should a struggling Family have to Pay an entrance fee so his kids can touch nature ? There should be a means test that would allow free entrance to these areas for the whole of Ontario . After all is that not part of Teaching , having young Families learning and appreciating Nature together ? As well all watersheds should have vegetative buffers between land use operations and the watercourses that flow to the Great Lakes . Again these could be Outdoor education centres where the Kids create and maintain this habitat .
LikeLike
So, essentially the NPCA Strategic Plan committees were stacked with developers, their lawyers and their “environmental” consultants? WTF? Is that even legal? Shame. A sad, sad day for conservation in Ontario.
LikeLike
I agree with Roberts on all points. Nothing surprises me really, any more. I am saddened by the corruption I see and read about at all levels of govt –federal, provincial, regional and municipal. Yes, all of ’em.
LikeLike
I only learned of the NPCA Strategic Plan today. With a Board consisting of politicians only I am not surprized that the Plan contains the intention to sell off Conservation Authority lands. I contribute to The Nature Conservancy of Canada each year. It’s vision if “to protect areas of natural diversity for their intrinsic value and for the benefit of out children and those after them”. It’s mission is to” lead, innovate and use creativity in the Conservation of Canada’s national heritage”. We need to protect the lands owned by the NPCA, not plans to sell them off. I was unable to find the Strategic Plan on the NPCA website which is telling in itself. Is there anyway of fighting the installation of this plan at this late date? If not, the lack of foresight by the Board of the NPCA will haunt our community in Niagara in the future.
LikeLike
Well written John. The statement: The most disturbing aspect of the Strategic Plan is its call for the “disposal” of now protected areas that are owned by the NPCA” is incredibly disheartening. I can’t believe that concept made it into a “strategic report”. It’s almost as disgusting as the NPCA treat their staff who stand up to these issues and statements..
LikeLike